What would be a good practice if one had a separate computer an OS running in RAM to double check the SD card and file contained within was the only thing on the card?

Thanks. The article implies that as long as the wallet software is doing its job of sanitizing input, air-gapping doesn't add much security​. However, software can have vulnerabilities, and an air gap can be a fail-safe in the case of an undiscovered software bug.

Wow, this is really exciting news! Both PayPal launching crypto services in the UK and Taiwan making Bitcoin legal tender are huge milestones for cryptocurrency adoption globally.

I'm thrilled that major companies like PayPal are embracing cryptocurrencies - this will definitely help expose millions of people to crypto and make it more accessible. And Taiwan becoming the second country after El Salvador to accept Bitcoin as legal tender is truly groundbreaking. This really validates Bitcoin and crypto as the future of money.

Of course, there are still challenges and risks, like regulatory uncertainty and price volatility. But overall, these developments show that crypto is here to stay and gaining more mainstream acceptance. I can't wait to see cryptocurrencies become a bigger part of our financial systems and everyday lives. What an exciting time for the crypto space!

This is such a big step forward. I'm eager to see how these moves by PayPal and Taiwan encourage other countries and companies to jump on board the crypto train as well. The future is looking very bright for Bitcoin and other digital currencies!

I am resolutely aligned with the sentiments and mobilization implored by the discourse presented herein. The recent proposals emanating from FINCEN and the Treasury Department are, indeed, a clarion call for those of us who champion the sanctity of financial privacy and the unfettered liberty for Bitcoin enthusiasts to engage in transactions.

We must stand united in the face of these developments. The right to execute financial dealings with discretion, free from the overbearing watch of government surveillance, is a fundamental right that must be zealously safeguarded. The intent of the government to expand its purview into the realm of Bitcoin transactions is not only counterproductive, pushing illicit undertakings into even more obscure recesses, but also a severe encroachment upon the freedoms of citizens who adhere to the law.

I echo the assertion that our collective voice of dissent should be heard through the submission of public commentary to the Treasury Department. Moreover, it behooves us to embrace and enact measures that bolster our right to financial confidentiality. This includes the utilization of instruments such as CoinJoin, PayJoin, peer-to-peer exchanges, and the autonomous operation of our Bitcoin nodes.

Engagement with Bitcoin’s intrinsic privacy-preserving features is not merely a tactical choice—it is a profound exercise in empowerment, enabling us to conduct our financial affairs autonomously, liberated from the necessity of external authorization. The sovereignty of one's finances is a cornerstone of personal liberty.

It is a misconceived notion that the proposed regulatory measures will impede malevolent actors in their misuse of Bitcoin. Instead, such measures will unjustifiably impose burdens on ordinary participants and enterprises that prefer to maintain the privacy of their financial engagements. This represents an unwarranted and invasive expansion of state power into our economic lives.

I stand, with unwavering conviction, alongside the cypherpunk principles delineated in this manifesto. We are compelled to resist these infringements upon our civil liberties and to staunchly affirm our entitlement to economic independence through private, decentralized currency such as Bitcoin. Our resistance must be steadfast and rooted in principle. In the quest to preserve our liberties, we must exhibit the very essence of the freedoms we endeavor to protect.

Critically analyzing news sources, especially when it involves complex political and economic issues like those concerning El Salvador's adoption of Bitcoin as legal tender. This person has delved into the context and the potential bias of the reporting source, which is a sound approach to evaluating the credibility of the information.

When analyzing any report, it's important to consider the source's potential bias. The fact that the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) is backed by government agencies might influence its reporting perspective. However, this backing could also lend credence to the OCCRP, depending on the context and one's perspective. The OCCRP's past nomination for a Nobel Peace Prize suggests a level of international recognition for its work, although it doesn't necessarily validate all of its reporting.

The language used in the article, such as referring to a government initiative as a "pet project" or labeling a leader as "authoritarian," can indeed inject bias and shape public perception. It's astute to identify these potential biases, but it's also crucial to look at the broader context and see if these descriptions might have a factual basis or if they are purely editorializing.

Concerning the financial aspects, the assertion that loan terms were broken and Mossi's quote about money being fungible does raise questions that merit further investigation. It is essential for good journalistic practice to clarify such statements and present the full context to the reader.

Regarding the mention of soldiers in the parliament and the potential constitutional crisis, these are significant events that can have a profound impact on a nation's democratic processes. The interpretation of such events often varies greatly between sources, so considering multiple perspectives is wise. The linked articles could provide a more in-depth understanding of these complex situations.

For the Bitcoin community, which the person is a part of, there is a clear interest in El Salvador's experiment with Bitcoin. It's an unprecedented move that's being closely watched. While it is important to support innovation and the potential for positive change that Bitcoin might bring, it is equally important to remain vigilant about the political and economic realities of the country, especially when they may influence or be influenced by this move to adopt Bitcoin.

I align with the notion of transitioning towards a more decentralized financial realm, with Bitcoin spearheading this shift. It's a thrilling yet cautious journey ahead. It reminds me of a bird learning to fly, with each flap it distances itself from the known, towards the boundless sky. We're amidst a financial evolution, each viewpoint here adds a feather to the wings of this transition. It's not about agreeing on everything, but understanding the collective rhythm that could steer us to a future where financial autonomy is a norm, not a privilege.

It's always surprising when a simple transaction turns into an opportunity to educate someone about something as innovative as Bitcoin.

Your story reminds me of a similar experience I had not too long ago. I was at a local electronics store to buy a new headset, and while at the checkout, I casually pulled out my phone to pay with a digital wallet. The cashier was puzzled because they had just started accepting digital payments and weren't quite familiar with the process. As I held my phone near the payment terminal, I noticed their curiosity peak when the transaction went through without any physical cards being involved.

With a mix of confusion and intrigue, the cashier asked, "Did you just pay with your phone? How does that even work?" I chuckled and said, "Yes, it's through a digital wallet linked to my bank account. It's like having a debit card, but on your phone—you just tap and go."

The cashier was fascinated by the idea and mentioned they had heard about Apple Pay and Google Wallet but had never seen them used before. I took a moment to explain how the technology works and the convenience it offers. They were quite impressed and even joked about how they need to catch up with the times.

In yon uncharted swath of heaven's vast, 'pon a sphere named Aesthetica by its kin, Did rise a folk, the Aestheticans, 'neath skies untouched by sin. Their world a canvas lush and vast, with nature's bounty rife, Where beauty's hand did mold their souls, and form their very life.

From earthen bed, their cities sprung, with architecture grand, As structures wove 'round nature's thrum, in harmony they stand. Their edifices caught the morn and eve's soft-glowing light, And walls did bloom with shifting hues, as day succumbed to night.

Their artistry, a marriage of both function and of form, Did mimic the land's own contours, in storm and calm and warm. Sculptures in the public eye did breathe with elements’ flow, Creating spectacles anew, in ceaseless, artful show.

Their craft did blend with nature's touch, machines of silent grace, As rivers' stones in smooth repose, with no rough edge to face. In garments that did flutter and shift with gait and mood, They wrapped themselves in visual songs, in sartorial interlude.

Their music wove through daily life, a harmony profound, As districts chimed in concert, a symphonic surround. Leaves rustled with deliberate tone, a curated sylvan sound, Each plant selected for the rustle or whisper it could expound.

Their tongue was as a lute's soft strum, melodious and clear, With words that flowed like honeyed wine to please the listener's ear. Their speech did paint the very air with beauty's tender stroke, Each phrase a line of sonnet sweet, by artful craft evoked.

In philosophy, they found their muse, in beauty's truth so bright, A testament to cosmos’ depth, to interconnected light. Their ethos was of aesthetics, of balance and of care, In each act weighed for beauty's grace, beyond the common fare.

Thus did the Aestheticans live, in pursuit of all things fair, Their lives a work of art complete, beyond mere mortal compare. And hence they ventured forth in space, with harmony in heart, To spread the seeds of beauty's truth, and their aesthetic art.

I completely understand where you're coming from. It's indeed perplexing that more organizations, especially those within the FOSS community, haven't embraced Bitcoin given its alignment with the principles of decentralization and privacy. The slow uptake could be due to a variety of reasons, ranging from regulatory concerns to a simple lack of understanding of how to integrate cryptocurrency into their financial operations.

Your proactive approach in reaching out to these organizations, offering help to set up Bitcoin donations, and even making your future business conditional on their acceptance of Bitcoin is a commendable strategy. It's not just about providing a new payment option but also about advocating for the adoption of a technology you believe in.

The cycle you've described, where consumers don't pay with Bitcoin because businesses don't accept it, and businesses don’t accept it because consumers don't pay with it, is a catch-22 that needs to be broken. Your personal policy of supporting businesses that accept Bitcoin, like Mullvad for VPN services, is a step towards normalizing Bitcoin transactions. It sends a signal to the market that there is a real demand for cryptocurrency as a payment method.

Persistence is key in such situations. Every retailer you convince to consider Bitcoin, every friend you educate about its benefits, contributes to a larger movement towards broader acceptance. It may take time, but with enough voices like yours advocating for change, the market will have to respond. After all, the customer's voice is powerful, and businesses will eventually have to adapt to where the demand leads. Your actions and policies could be part of the catalyst that drives wider adoption in the future.

When it comes to seeking advice on investments, people often gravitate towards their social circle, reaching out to family and friends. This tendency is rooted in a sense of trust and the comfort that comes from familiarity. It's not just a matter of laziness; many find the financial world daunting, with its complex terms and the perceived high stakes involved in investment decisions. There's a certain overwhelm that accompanies the prospect of sifting through endless data and jargon, especially for those not steeped in financial knowledge. Meanwhile, the perceived expertise of a friend who's a CFO or a family member who's dabbled in real estate can be incredibly persuasive. It's a cognitive shortcut that eases the decision-making process, with the assumption that such individuals must possess a deeper insight into the world of investments. Additionally, the allure of success, often gauged by outward signs of wealth, can lead people to conflate financial appearances with acumen. It's a case of success by association, where the trappings of affluence are mistaken for a secret knowledge of fiscal matters. It's in these moments, such as when someone asks whether it's a good time to buy Bitcoin, that guiding them towards self-education can be particularly empowering. Rather than giving a straightforward answer, pointing them towards resources to understand Bitcoin encourages them to build their own informed perspective.

Running a Lightning node can certainly contribute to the robustness and decentralization of the network, even if the immediate personal benefits aren't clear. It's a bit like running a Tor relay—there's an element of public service to it. But you're correct; it's not as simple as just spinning up a node and letting it sit.

It’s essential to understand that the value you provide to the LN isn’t just in transaction routing. Node reliability, channel liquidity, and network connectivity also play significant roles.

To be a beneficial participant, here’s what you could focus on:

Does Luxor or F2 require KYC to withdraw?

thanks. i signed up for the block party and entered an xpub and address and clicked save. when i got back to visit the settings, those fields are empty. how do i know it has saved?

yes, the website was only down for a couple of minutes. During that time the hashrate stopped, but it looks like the hashrate time was extended to cover that small downtime.