pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @konstantin21 20 Nov \ parent \ on: Searching "bitcoin" on youtube has changed over the years bitcoin
Last I checked a few weeks ago most of the invidious instances were blocked. do you have any working ones?
university economics = keynesian economics.
creating credentialed mouthpieces for the money printer.
- the powers and responsibilities of constables seem to vary greatly from state to state. Is that why you use the generic "get him on his oath"? Does constable here mean something close to "one in law enforcement with the oath below."
- The daily points are great but are there any books you recommend going deeper?
“I, _______________________, do solemnly swear (or affirm), that I will faithfully execute the duties of the office of ___________________ of the State of _____, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States and of this State, so help me God.”
Posed the question to AI and this may just be the loophole:
The contradiction Gödel may have identified here is that the Constitution appears to rely on self-consistency for democratic continuity but lacks any intrinsic safeguard against a self-referential modification that would negate its own premises. Thus, Gödel’s concern may have been that the Constitution logically allows for its own undoing in a way that defies the democratic principles it is meant to uphold. This, for a logician, would constitute a true contradiction: a system that both guarantees democracy and allows for the abolition of democracy through its own rules.
This paradox—known in logic as a "self-amendment paradox" or "self-referential inconsistency"—suggests that the Constitution could theoretically enable an amendment that invalidates its own democratic principles or amends away the amendment power itself.
In logical terms, Article V allows the Constitution to be self-modifying, meaning it could alter the very conditions of its own existence. For example:
Scenario 1: Congress or a convention could amend the Constitution to prohibit any further amendments, thus contradicting the very nature of a "living" document.
Scenario 2: An amendment could be passed that eliminates all democratic processes, effectively installing a permanent authoritarian regime.
In both cases, the Constitution would simultaneously be both democratic (because amendments are allowed by democratic process) and anti-democratic (because the amendments could eliminate democratic processes).
66 sats \ 0 replies \ @konstantin21 5 Nov \ parent \ on: What is the best map in gaming history? gaming
came here for CS maps but dust over dust2 for me...or cs_rats!!
then why is support moving to matrix? your support is so killer I have fears that matrix will shittify that record with cumbersome UX. really hope I'm wrong.
tariffs create deadweight loss but also create incentive to onshore.
consumers do not pay more for local goods. that's the whole point.
bro...it's a chinese company. its 100% defacto owned by CCP. they're required to have party secretaries at all high level meetings.
it seems he understood exactly what he was doing "we're not in this for the money"
I sincerely thank them for their donation to the network!
that provides no direct benefit to the PT economy though so why would they offer citizenship to you?
i believe the "unbound fund" that you invest with is portuguese? maybe their web3 companies are as well
