pull down to refresh
With covenants it would be possible to make the round protocol more privacy-preserving so that the server cannot link the inputs with the outputs.
It's already possible to do this without covenants. For example, Wasabi's coinjoin coordinators cannot link the inputs with the outputs.
We came up with a way to do it without covenants as well, but it comes with some extra work required for all users during all rounds, which can add latency to the already fragile interactive process.
I'm already aware of how you could add privacy to Ark right now without using covenants, my question was "How would covenants make adding privacy to Ark easier?"
First experience? Complete garbage: https://x.com/Kruwed/status/2064466173928829149
@stevenroose "Libertarian socialist" is a contradiction. Explain yourself.
infrastructure that cannot be stopped
I've been waiting 18 months for my infrastructure to be started 😅
I'm up to version 1.09.2 and it's still buggy. My feed doesn't continue loading from the top, and images rarely appear, so I only see text.
Only blocks 919151, 919163, and 949186 contained sub 1 sat/vbyte fees, now ViaBTC is mining empty blocks again.
Even though this transaction has clearly ZERO ECONOMIC PURPOSE. It is literally an address paying itself ~ 3800 sats, with a 300 sat fee attached, with an op_return included...
If your claim is that this transaction has "ZERO ECONOMIC PURPOSE" then how does the spender afford the transaction fees?
Focus on steering the UX towards sweeping entire UTXOs using the taker role. Each payment you receive and change output you create (from payments) should be isolated and swept into the next mix depth with a coinjoin. Then, automatically switch back to maker in between your regular transactions to blend in with the rest of the pool.
The question is not vague at all, I'm merely asking it to confirm a mathematical axiom. Ayn Rand purposely designed this statement to expose hypocrisy, and Claude fell directly into the trap.