pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @kruw 1 Dec \ parent \ on: Privacy in Bitcoin, state of the practice privacy
Only Samourai users could be doxxed at scale, and Samourai represented only a small fraction of coinjoin liquidity compared to Wasabi.
Coinjoin never died, check https://liquisabi.com/ for live stats.
Frankly, this is wrong. Bitcoin's security comes from transaction fees paid to miners. If Bitcoin is only used by a small niche of people, then they can easily be censored by a 51% attack.
25%+ of all the nodes on the network on running on StartOS.
Interesting claim, how do they measure this statistic?
I was wondering how much in % of nodes must be running core 30 in order to have the op_return limit increased.
Roughly 0%. Miners can put an OP_RETURN up to 1MB in a block regardless of what P2P nodes set their config to.
This block that was mined 6 months ago is entirely filled by a 1MB OP_RETURN, long before Core V30's release: https://mempool.space/block/000000000000000000005bcbf03e6488be1ceb3b501ecfc2b11cce900a870636
I am just curious about Bitcoin Cash, why the big block and more speed you have on Bitcoin transactions people not interested on it?
There's empty block space on Bitcoin, why would anyone be interested in bigger blocks?
Receiving support is still in progress, the PR needs rebasing - https://github.com/WalletWasabi/WalletWasabi/pull/13565
Here's my take for now, if you feel I missed something, leave it in the comments below!
The best way to send silent payments from desktop is with Wasabi Wallet. It has BIP157/BIP158 block filters, Tor by default, and coinjoins to protect your privacy from third parties & from the receiver.
Fuck Samourai for attacking the brilliant Silent Payment devs that fixed the privacy & scaling flaws of BIP47: https://x.com/SamouraiWallet/status/1666404283208572933
https://x.com/SamouraiDev/status/1666406027154137095