pull down to refresh
@optimism
577,573 sats stacked
stacking since: #879734longest cowboy streak: 117npub13wvyk...hhes6rk47y
but that's a test to check if you're human
No no... Thats what they say it is! But what makes us think they're not lying? Them Tech Bros not gonna fool this Opti!
"Slide the slider to the right until it fits?" That'd be like a test for a human whose age is expressed in months. What they are really after is covert tests whether our LLM usage is successfully causing the intended brain damage.
I wrote a 3 page email to a colleague about the awful shit they're repeating online (about a project we're both maintainers for)
I didn't like my tone so I deleted it all, rewrote and then it was a 2 page email.
Then it hit me: wtf am I doing?
So I deleted the entire thing and didn't send any email.
At least I got to train my pianofingers.
Isn't this why some of the captchas now have a time-you-took-to-complete-it feature? I always take it slow because I want to be mid.
I really don't know so maybe someone else knows. I don't really care about rewards that much myself so in general I think I get too much rewards compared to people that may write more interesting content. I don't think I have a lot of
trust
(shouldn't trust me, because don't trust, verify) so my zapping content doesn't really help people.I think this could be useful. Any post you, ek or undisciplined interacts with is per definition top-ranked.
the latter: use human judges. read it all. form an opinion. read it again. Just have to get high quality judges.
For my weekly AI content aggregation post I discover content by:
- Anyway reading everything posted to the territory as it comes in
- On Monday reading everything I missed (i.e. on other territories that didn't make it to
hot
or while I was busy/asleep) - Filter out slop if any (not much)
Then I "pre-judge" by:
- sort everything by comments first, to see what got most engagement, maybe pick some stuff that is interesting
- sort everything by sats (not zaprank), to see what got most upzapped
Then I decide what to highlight by:
- finding posts that I personally think match nicely together, especially if they're arguing opposing sides or can be narrated as a reinforcement of a point.
we see more or fewer re-mix movies
Will depend on the individual desire? Say you don't care and just want cheap entertainment on your phone while Copilot is answering your emails for you: you may see more and it doesn't matter. Just don't want to be bored. Someone else, however, will be too busy answering their emails so they don't have time for slop and they watch much less movies, but authentic only, and they pay for that.
I wonder if we'll form markets for "authentic" content like we form markets for authentic collectibles.
I think that we could say that Spotify and Netflix are markets for authentic content, just it's not transactional. The question will be how they're going to react: subscription price 10x and walled garden (which in turn may incentivize some more piracy), or less curation, more slop.
By being non-confrontational. The trick is to not say some things and be patient, or even better, gently steer the counterparty into bringing up the less pleasant stuff of their own accord (though that's an art.)
The effect will be that intellectual property of anything digitized (ideas, knowledge, skills) becomes a commodity. Just like "generating a ton of text that to the untrained eye sounds reasonable" has become a commodity recently.
This could lead to a couple of things:
- Reputation and authenticity to become increasingly important for a small section of society.
- This means more DRM, more digital signatures, more walled gardens, for those of us who need authenticity.
- The masses will not care, just like they don't care now, watching TikTok all day.
- These will be milked with subscription upon subscription and services that pop up and rug overnight.
- Prices for authentic content will go up steeply, because there will be much less demand.
- This could bring in a new era of internet piracy for those that want a copy of authentic stuff without the annoying AI flaws.
PS: when I was in Europe last month, they were talking there about extending IP laws, specifically to include one's physical attributes, making deep fakes an infringement on copyright. So I'm not so sure that outside North America, IP laws aren't as important as inside it.