pull down to refresh
@optimism
333,079 sats stacked
stacking since: #879734longest cowboy streak: 76npub13wvyk...hhes6rk47y
42 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 2h \ on: A monthly review. Is this territory worth keeping around? AskSN
It's my fav territory <3
For every article you write, there will be a million people writing the same pattern. Thus, all you need is a million people copying your text.
This is also what makes LLMs worthless - they ingest all the crap and will continue to do so to get alignment.
I'm skeptical that these other nations will advance very far
India, if they focus. UK, if they are finally ready to deliver on that Brexit promise. EU seems lost.
you just sign in into cypherflow with the same nostr nsec
Let's not, that's a security risk AND a privacy risk
(or nostr browser extension).
Less of a security risk (although browser extensions are a risk themselves), but still a privacy risk
When you're on a learning curve in terms of personal development, then you'll also make execution errors, which is fine. I think that my distinction differs in importance based on expectations: we often allow an apprentice more mistakes than the expert craftsman we've paid top dollar for, also because we limit our exposure with the apprentice.
Announcement: https://www.hume.ai/blog/how-to-clone-your-voice-with-ai
Date: January 14, 2025
That's expected, because:
- Portfolios that track the S&P500 need to buy in
- Listings cause visibility and awareness
paying off my debt or Should I buy bitcoin then leverage it into a loan on strike then pay off all the debts
Do you want to be free, or do you want to be wealthy?
If the former, just pay off your debt.
If the latter, leverage and take a risk but stay a slave to fiat.
(edit: @siggy47's answer is better)
That last point is odd because most other countries have very significant trade barriers. Even with Trump at the helm, America is one of the most open markets for global trade.
I formulated this to myself as not a concept of absolutes, but relatively. A couple of decades ago when I worked interim for a Canadian high-end industrial tool manufacturer, not just the proximity, but the NAFTA-enabled barrier-free trade was making the US a powerful market. When a US customer asked for something, we'd pay much more attention to it than when a European customer would, because it was easier to do business and to sell a particular requirement to more than just one client.
Nowadays, Canada has a better treaty, from the ease-of-business (and reliability) perspective, with the EU than with the US (mostly because all the insane EU laws are anyway present in Canada, so there's no real additional friction there.) I can totally imagine that solutions get more and more tailored to European ideas and requirements as trade with Europe grows relatively to the US in that organization - maybe I should travel to ON, have some beers, and find out - and that is a slow path to decreasing US business because the product will start to slowly fit less into the US market demands - though note that this would require not 3 months but a decade or so of the same decisions we've seen recently.
The more barriers to trade you erect, the more isolated you'll become. This is a slow process though, and 3 months or a year of uncertainty can be overcome, except for those that are leveraged too much.
There are different kinds of failure:
- Assumption failure. You operated (perfectly) on an assumption (there always are some) that turned out to be wrong. As long as the assumption wasn't overly naive, this is great because it's a learning moment. Bonus points if you were aware of your assumption.
- Execution failure. Basically you effed up even though your idea was (maybe) right. I think this should be prevented and is why you can pay a CEO the big bucks to get things done.
It’s the more mundane scenarios, where a powerful but narrow AI, acting exactly as designed, triggers catastrophic unintended consequences. Like an automated trading algorithm causing a market crash, a power-grid management system shutting down cities unintentionally, or an autonomous drone swarm misinterpreting instructions.
Much like a powerful human would. So the question is: how do you defend against risks like these now that power can - theoretically - be scaled?
I tried it; currently I'm only getting results on the free models despite sending a nut to it, so I withdrew again - will try again at a later point.
I was looking at peertube the other day when I went on a tangent to see who is working on the zk part to fix #1036775 and I got lead to some of the OG guys from the 90s.
It works okay for recorded vids but I don't know how well it works for streaming. Something to find out.