pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @pietro1861 OP 28 Mar 2024 \ parent \ on: A protocol for improved layer two bitcoin payments by supertestnet bitcoin
sorry I haven't seen it...
No more value4value...I prefere support creators directly with lightining donations...I, we, don't need another third party
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @pietro1861 OP 5 Dec 2023 freebie \ parent \ on: Is there any issue on SN? bitcoin
OK understood! In my opinion it could be better have on the item only the zapping count and treat rewards simple as rewards maybe connect to the item that generated them. In this way is really confused. Thank you for support.
Using youtube bar you may easily find Alex interview..but my mistake don't drop correct link here. Listen to past to understand present..so actually, in my opinion, LN isn't still ready for mass adoption...Yeah, one year later we have a more stable and powerfull product but the same problem from this interview are still here..You have to consider also operator side and not only user side..
Yes, beacuse witness with segwit is out of transaction so the hash doesn't include it anymore. Witness is the only part of the transaction that could be changed...so it fixes "this bug". But in my opinion it's important know everything about Bitcoin
Now we have it and it's official (video and audio are very very good quality ones)...But I prefere BitTorrent version :D
Not in this way and not with downloadable apks..In my opinion obviously..My idea is to realize a really AppStore on Protocol. Sorry, I need to clarify everything on a tech poc on Github
She's https://twitter.com/niftynei a bitcoin builder and educator on https://base58.school/ . She released also on Udemy https://www.udemy.com/course/base58-bitcoin-transactions-one/?referralCode=4405769CAB73A12745F4 a very interesting course...even if on Udemy ahahah