pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @pueblerino 16 Jun 2023 \ on: Which linux desktop distribution would you recommend? tech
pop! semms to run pretty fine for those kind of 'indie, and blue collar professional's out there
launching my website https://moizen.xyz photography project https://moizen.xyz/eyeoncitadel and soonish... https://plebeian.market/stall/moizen
CONALEP is a public school system in Mexico. Some kids colluded with staff were running monero daemon on school machines lol; plus got busted trading shitcoins
Value mightn't be flawed without the 'evaluator' being flawed too. Yet a flawed value might be exploitable for other parties; so for in whatever exchange that at first glance seems to be a pure p2p exchange(private), the value of the object that persons A and B are trying to evaluate each for themselves, are at the same time subjects to the perceptual value of their respective counterpart (making it a public value).
At essence, a transaction might be an exercise of both delimitation and comparison; and I'd argue that amounts of self reflection are necessary as well as objective ways of valuate value...
Everyone knows that the winner of any philosophical argument is the one using the cooler Latin phrase.
lol
Language shapes mentality.
Beauty on language is that it shapes the world too :D
See, language might have occurred to give birth and name to experience; in our case, the experience of being alive. This meaning each language is an actual manifestation of both the senses of being, and being-in-the-world; understood as how we (humans) can make through existence and apprehend its logic and coherence...
Romans as bad mofos; indeed very much. However a similar itch could surge for say, Mayan, Chinese, Norwegian, and so, if we take in hand their languages as a way to experience and ultimately to see and understand stuff :)
Do you see bitcoin development/adoption as enough good reason to settle and stop/pause nomadism?
How does bitcoin has changed your perception/appreciation for places? (if any)
Thanks!
Thank you too; sorry for the confusing questions: trial and error, now that I think.
Last one that should had been the first and only: Personal definition of experience and, if possible, of 'the' bitcoin-experience
Alright, a serious one on adoption, please:
TL;DR Question: Name your authors on sociology, philosophy and architecture (if any)
Long Question:
Say we have a 'bitcoinized' place:
a) We have a geographical region and within: human settlements, each with its own social/cultural structures of parts:whole;
b) Some/or the whole of its inhabitants bitcoin is destined to 'build and maintain channels' (infrastructure whatsoever: roads, bridges, transport); and,
c) The region is self sufficient, resources speaking; the only 'out-border' exchanges are cultural ones.
Would you:
- Find reasonable to 'lock' this regional bitcoin quantity and atomize it in order to monetize 'public work' within its inhabitants?
- If yes: Each region of the World might be developed under similar market structures, differentiated only by the relation of bitcoin-qty:regional-needs; Would this be a form of 'tokenized/federated' bitcoin that might work like bitcoin itself these days (lightning, c-lightning)?
- If no: Which other ways of 'riddance of fiat, now and for all' might be suggestible? The lock of bitcoin mightn't be a new recipe: pre-colombine era were more or less like it: lesser settlements related to a 'center' yet, each with it's own culture AND token/form of money.
Cheers Jaff, thanks for the AMA
What's with the hivemind, Ser; any thoughts on a possible loosen of the individuality of the Self?
Alternative question: Your ideal football eleven
I'm not gonna lie... topic is delicate in the sense that it can go to the border of both the so called piracy and intellectual property
My point is about markets (labor and services prices/wages) and demographic balancing (geolocation, regional shaping)
Say for example, Austin HQ struggles to keep the hq afloat: wide range of tactics can be planned/projected ahead
One part of the scope; related particularly to merchandise and imagery, happens to be a market with a demographic un-balance
I explain myself: The technicians, professionals and even street artists, they all need to pay further than those in places where life is cheaper: These being expensive materials, expensive services; and particularly for handcrafted products, I think on villages around the world whom artisans are struggling to make a living. At the end might be better a question on supply chain building: Thinking since stickers, primarily, but what about swag, tools (like metal plates,) and so on, towards an actual real estate built since and around a bitcoin ethos...
I argue urbanism is much about walking; and I'm learning is also about speaking with people. So for there are moments when places and talking collides trough bitcoin as a way to palliate problems -recognized as bitcoin worthy to fix- and doing that on places where violence is even not that explicit per se can put in serious trouble to said bitcoin entrepreneurs but harming lastly and mostly innocent people within said place that is usually also the ones who needs bitcoin the most.
I like to seeing it as bitcoin scaling its way towards sociability. What I fear as the hard way of doing it might be -talking since experience- the most violent places... before violence there are aggressiveness; and the latter could be perceived since the mere way places are build and thus 'habituated' -or dwell-