How is that Mutiny a good example here all of sudden. Simple Bitcoin Wallet has seen A FRACTION of money Mutiny has received and it keeps running anyway under Valet ♦️ brand.

That's just reductionism.

Just no.

There is no sense to have tokens onchain.

The only in the list who does well is LNMarkets. That's it.

Big fat meh.

Supporting both types of custodial channels is on the Roadmap.

Sure be careful, fiat channel is in dollars. Practically a stable inside LN. Better open a channel to use sats only.

Great let's stay in touch.

"synchronizes well" can't be true for Blixt. Next time try Valet ♦️ please

Unless it is implied that the transaction must happen.

A different name for communism. Good catch phrase invented by relatively successful Podcasters.

I would be very sad and proceed with stacking sats.

Sure, ty very much. Use Github for bug reports, please.

Valet ♦️ is optimized for mobile. Working app consumes 150 MB of storage space and quite low traffic.

Could be also an indication of more longer term holders.

Coinos is relatively well-known if compared to Valet. https://geyser.fund/project/valetlightning

Here's project that leverages Venmo https://github.com/zkp2p/zk-p2p/tree/develop/circuits-circom here's more generic email related project that may work with any payment provider sending notifications via email. https://github.com/zkemail/zk-email-verify

You may surprize but it is used for example for generating proofs from emails Stripe sends or other payment provider. Basically fiat payment proof.

I realized that people didn't bring in topic of p2p trader security / threat vectors. These guys are swimming in risks and sometimes they share it in personal communication. It is just truly dangerous place to be in and it spans from physical threats to phishing and software bugs/bad UX.