pull down to refresh
I don't think I dislike BIP 110 enough to run something like this.
If there was a soft fork proposal using a similar activation method but intending to prevent OFAC sanctioned addresses from transacting, I would certainly run invalidateblock.
To me, whoever proposes a change to bitcoin is always the aggressor. Some changes end up being changes that we agree are good and accept (eg. Segwit or Taproot). But my first assumption is that the any change to bitcoin is hostile. Therefore, I think using something like invalidateblock or even a change to the PoW algorithm is valid to prevent changes.
It is essential. We're talking about putting our phones away from 6-9 pm or something. It's crazy how phones pervade our lives.
Kevin's thread is excellent! Thanks for posting it. I believe this thread may have helped move the conversation about how bip 110 affects miniscript forward. Super says breaking manuscript is one if his reasons for not support bip 110.
Our rule is no phones at the table. As in not in sight, not in pockets, not near you, not answerable or checkable. We've managed to keep this rule so far...
Very cool! I've been interested in convincing my family to try something that's a bit more nomadic, but thus far we've only flirted with it in transitions between more settled things. It is very attractive to me.
The mental accounting you do makes a lot of sense. I can see how it helps with perspective.
If I may ask without it sounding too probing, how do your children do with the nomadic lifestyle?
While I am clearly in need of such a bot, I suspect there is no substitute for arming myself with a little better skill, or coming up with a new way to think about posting interesting things (=probably posting less github links I find).
There is a frantic-ness to things right now, FOMO or fear that I'm not producing enough value to be useful to people -- which leads to producing less value. I think you have pointed it out before, but this is a consequence of AI that I'm finding all over myself like some horrible rash.
Another example is that zig openclaw rewrite I posted the other day (#1445161). I did not look at the code at all nor did I have much sense of who the creator was or their credibility. I did have a rough idea of the concept (small, zig has a good reputation) and it didn't have glaring signs of slop.
I'm hopeful that there is a useful role posting such stuff can play: flagging projects for people who do want to look into it further. But your point really makes me wonder about the usefulness of amplification from someone like me who does not have the skills to do due diligence.
Perhaps I should just stick to bitcoin stuff where at least I have a rough idea of whether the idea makes sense (even if I haven't evaluated the code).
What are you curious about that you don't find on SN?