@badabing
65,400 sats stacked
stacking since: #53292longest cowboy streak: 7
by
for
Impressive, don't forget the advantage of acquiring pristine non-kyc sats, which come at a premium nowadays.
Thanks for sharing. This means there's no big difference for buying goods and services in EU. No mandatory kyc.
The tx you are referring to is an ordinal/inscription. The purpose of such a tx is not to send funds but to "inscribe" jpegs or mint shittokens in tx on the blockchain. By design they are uneconomical as they pay consistently more in fees than they move in funds.
Many merchants accepting bitcoin is an absolute must for this.
Bitcoin can most definitely be broken by soft forks. Rigorous testing of use cases is required. Do we really need some of these features? Bitcoin is working fine as is, and new changes to the base layer will inevitably carry risks.
As you point out, we are still discovering new possibilities with the current base layer now. Imo, we should indeed try to find vulnerabilities (and possibly fix them) before a gov does. But the fix should not be worse than the problem.
E.g. Ordinals might not be exploited now, but they might become an issue later (gov subsidizing spam-only blocks). It's good that we are aware of these attack vectors.
Can you go more into detail on the bloat? Are you talking about the UTXO set increasing more rapidly ?
So even then you ended up losing money.
Probably best to give up on your "entrepreneur" dream, and realize you've become just another scammer.
You run a business?
Ah right, the only way you can run a profitable business is by scamming people.