pull down to refresh
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @gregtonoski 13 Mar \ parent \ on: Is this your wife Darth? lol
Anybody can hodl sats and spouses don't have to know about each other's stack.
Indeed, peak clown marketing. Let's call that bullshit out. The y axis is duration so degradation instead of improvement of performance.
The fear is normal. Get used to it. Tools are little intuitive and mistakes are commonplace. Don't rush, test, backup and share your experience to build knowledge and better tools.
That's the reason Satoshi decided to stay anonymous - he feared parting his BTCs in divorce legal proceedings, did he?
Bitcoiners, your transactions with lower fee-rates are already relayed by mempool.guide.
Fee-rates as low as 0.001 sat/vbyte!
- Correct.
- Disagree.
- Disagree. Would you apply the same logic/concern to other p2p networks, e.g. Torrent, perhaps?
- Not accepted.
I haven't claimed that miners were considering transactions paying less than minTxRelayFeerate (although they might have).
I think that the example proved that a "transaction paying less than minRelayTxFeerate" may be confirmed. I don't see what else may need to be proved.
Let's not exaggerate. This setting reconfiguration doesn't cause endless amounts of data to be forwarded.
What makes you considering a transaction with fee at 1 sat/vbyte as okay while the same transaction with smaller fee, e.g. at 0.1 sat/vbyte as not okay ("useless data")?
That's ok. In the end there is one transaction in mempools. A transaction is replaced with another one of the same size. What do you think justifies charging additional fee in such a case?
List of them: https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transactions?s=time(desc)&q=fee(0..98),is_coinbase(false)#f=hash,block_id,input_count,output_count,time,output_total,output_total_usd,fee_usd,fee,is_coinbase
Example of such a transaction: https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/49a0efc983b19038cb5aa80008d7b9f7690dfb80de84a55f7aabce9d3137f2fa