pull down to refresh
50 sats \ 2 replies \ @gregtonoski 20 Oct \ on: AWS Outage tech
How many Bitcoin nodes have gone down?
Illogical, you think nfts and other crap can't sustain themselves because of high fees (cost) whereas Bitcoin could sustain itself despite high fees (cost).
Fees are there to differentiate among competing Bitcoin transactions (transfers). They are not there to differentiate between Bitcoin and crap of NFT/any other category.
The whole point is that your Bitcoin transaction should not compete with crap (like NFT) on Bitcoin. Learn more at: https://wtfhappenedinfeb2023.com/common-narratives-around-spam/high-fees-will-solve-spam
I think you are misleading. The question was about your definition that you referred to: "will by definition outpace and outspend the non-monetary use case by definition..." and not about definition of Bitcoin.
I asked about your definition. You replied without answering. Do you have anything to hide, perhaps?
Bitcoin Knots is more powerful and better maintained Bitcoin node software, independent implementation.
Bitcoin Core is getting closer to BSV and more like a spamming tool (malware) dependent on corporate business plans to exploit fools. Except "embrace flexibility", yes, your description looks accurate, I think.
Yes, it is safe in that situation. Your secret keys (wallet) are on your local machine and not a remote one. They can't drain your wallet as a result. They can't redirect your transaction to different address.
Yes they can cut your access off (which would be against their business).
Apples 🍏 to oranges 🍊 comparison.
Spam and monetary Bitcoin transactions are two completely different beasts, "ain't the same ballpark, ain't the same league, ain't even the same f* sport". If you run a genuine node you accept monetary Bitcoin transactions flow and reject spam.
Calle is seeking attention (and grants $$$) only.
It wouldn't have been difficult to support his simple claims if they had been true. The wall of his text is lacking substance.