reply on: What does the sats under predyx market choices mean? \ stacker news ~Stacker

pull down to refresh

40 sats \ 19 replies \ @Coinsreporter 16h \ on: What does the sats under predyx market choices mean? Stacker_Sports

Just hedge against the 49ers by buying Yes shares on other teams.

They are too dumb to do that. They are happy to lock up hundreds of thousands of sats for 5 months to make 10% even though they could have made that 10x over betting other markets between now and then.

50 sats \ 5 replies \ @Coinsreporter 16h

Yes, I don't understand what's bit their minds! very stupid tbh. Why put 500k sats to get 50k?? I'm not putting my sats on them, not until they're down to 4-5%.

40 sats \ 3 replies \ @HardMoney OP 16h

It’s more satisfying buying No shares. Plus what if some wild card team out of nowhere wins the SB

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 16h

What if that wild card team is the 49ers. Haha. Bye bye sats. Lose 170k sats to try to make 17k.

40 sats \ 1 reply \ @HardMoney OP 16h

Could be but they have to make the playoffs first

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 15h

Well 1-0 in the division is a good start. Second half of the season schedule is very easy. If they get through week 8 with a 4-4 record and kittle, purdy, aiyuk, mustafa are all back you better hope Kyler is playing at an MVP level or Stafford suddenly has the back of a 30 year old. Of course 10 other guys could be injured between now and then and you might be right they might miss the playoffs.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 16h

It's even worse than that. Traditional sports books have the 49ers around 5% chance to win the Super Bowl. So what they are arbing is the difference between what the odds should be 5% and what they are 12%. So in gross terms they will earn 10-12% but one net when you calculate the 5% potential risk of loss they are only earning 5-7%. And the funniest part is they think they are so smart for doing it.

0 sats \ 11 replies \ @Coinsreporter 15h

I can totally relate this with @Undisciplined buying No shares for 1.4M SN items and Yes shares for 1.5M items. I can't get his strategy. Is it rocket science that the lower number will have to be Yes to reach to the higher??

10 sats \ 10 replies \ @HardMoney OP 15h

He just wants to troll @grayruby with no 49er exposure

21 sats \ 9 replies \ @grayruby 15h

@Undisciplined hedged out all his NO shares via bets on betplay. He knows the 49ers are winning the Super Bowl.

40 sats \ 8 replies \ @Undisciplined 14h

More that I think they’re likely enough to wind that I’m scared of being completely exposed

82 sats \ 7 replies \ @HardMoney OP 14h

I’d do a 2x leveraged etf of 9ers no if I could

Want fully unhedged exposure

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @grayruby 13h

Ok Colin Coward. I do think the Cardinals probably beat them next week with Brock, Kittle, Robinson and Aiyuk out. So you can laugh it up when the Cardinals are 3-0 atop the division and I will enjoy the last laugh after week 18.

40 sats \ 5 replies \ @HardMoney OP 13h

Yes. If the cards aren’t 3-0 after facing Rattler, Young, and Jones I might consider abandoning my fandom altogether

view all 5 replies