reply on: What does the sats under predyx market choices mean? \ stacker news ~Stacker

pull down to refresh

21 sats \ 18 replies \ @grayruby 16h \ parent \ on: What does the sats under predyx market choices mean? Stacker_Sports

They are too dumb to do that. They are happy to lock up hundreds of thousands of sats for 5 months to make 10% even though they could have made that 10x over betting other markets between now and then.

50 sats \ 5 replies \ @Coinsreporter 16h

Yes, I don't understand what's bit their minds! very stupid tbh. Why put 500k sats to get 50k?? I'm not putting my sats on them, not until they're down to 4-5%.

40 sats \ 3 replies \ @HardMoney OP 15h

It’s more satisfying buying No shares. Plus what if some wild card team out of nowhere wins the SB

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 15h

What if that wild card team is the 49ers. Haha. Bye bye sats. Lose 170k sats to try to make 17k.

40 sats \ 1 reply \ @HardMoney OP 15h

Could be but they have to make the playoffs first

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 15h

Well 1-0 in the division is a good start. Second half of the season schedule is very easy. If they get through week 8 with a 4-4 record and kittle, purdy, aiyuk, mustafa are all back you better hope Kyler is playing at an MVP level or Stafford suddenly has the back of a 30 year old. Of course 10 other guys could be injured between now and then and you might be right they might miss the playoffs.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 15h

It's even worse than that. Traditional sports books have the 49ers around 5% chance to win the Super Bowl. So what they are arbing is the difference between what the odds should be 5% and what they are 12%. So in gross terms they will earn 10-12% but one net when you calculate the 5% potential risk of loss they are only earning 5-7%. And the funniest part is they think they are so smart for doing it.

0 sats \ 11 replies \ @Coinsreporter 15h

I can totally relate this with @Undisciplined buying No shares for 1.4M SN items and Yes shares for 1.5M items. I can't get his strategy. Is it rocket science that the lower number will have to be Yes to reach to the higher??

10 sats \ 10 replies \ @HardMoney OP 15h

He just wants to troll @grayruby with no 49er exposure

21 sats \ 9 replies \ @grayruby 15h

@Undisciplined hedged out all his NO shares via bets on betplay. He knows the 49ers are winning the Super Bowl.

40 sats \ 8 replies \ @Undisciplined 14h

More that I think they’re likely enough to wind that I’m scared of being completely exposed

82 sats \ 7 replies \ @HardMoney OP 14h

I’d do a 2x leveraged etf of 9ers no if I could

Want fully unhedged exposure

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @grayruby 13h

Ok Colin Coward. I do think the Cardinals probably beat them next week with Brock, Kittle, Robinson and Aiyuk out. So you can laugh it up when the Cardinals are 3-0 atop the division and I will enjoy the last laugh after week 18.

40 sats \ 5 replies \ @HardMoney OP 13h

Yes. If the cards aren’t 3-0 after facing Rattler, Young, and Jones I might consider abandoning my fandom altogether

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @grayruby 13h

Mac looked sharp in camp and preseason. Not that that means anything. His issue is lack of mobility which isn't great considering the 49ers have a serviceable at best OLine.

Mac probably would have taken at least 5 sacks last week against the Seahawks

view all 4 replies