pull down to refresh

Howdy there, partner! Welcome on into the Stacker Saloon.

Saddle on up to a stool and spill the beans about your day, fire away with them questions, or let loose and give us the lowdown on your wild and woolly life. We're all ears, so don't hold back!

We're open round the clock, so mosey on in whenever you please!

Bookmarkable vibes https://lofi.cafe

reply

Woah.

reply

So...nick szabo started tweeting again?

view on x.com
reply
42 sats \ 7 replies \ @ek 27 Sep

Does the following make sense:

If we would really care about censorship resistance, we wouldn't need a protocol that enforces it, we could just agree on a social level that we will not censor each other or kick the ones out that do (is that itself a form of censorship?).

But we don't really care, so we invent protocols that acknowledge that we don't but show what's in it for us.

reply

bitcoin layer zero is underestimated and ignored all the time; the best term we got to convey the idea "bitcoin-the-people" is "circular economies and citadels" - but encouraging people to look at themselves is still a big ask;

it's not a rocket science - the bullshit in the land of the academons is the rocket science, purposely made very nonsensical and complex;

learn the proper information, act in unity, create favorable conditions for people, starting with urself; what is so complicated?

reply

It doesn't make sense to me.

we could just agree on a social level

But like how? How would we reach this agreement? It doesn't make sense because of "just."

reply
102 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 28 Sep

I don’t think the how matters for the question why we need something that forces us to care about something we say we do

But maybe an example would help:

Imagine you’re marrying someone and you say you will absolutely never, under no circumstances, break up. But then you setup a contract to make sure what happens if it does happen.

Isn’t setting up the contract an acknowledgement that the “absolutely never, under no circumstances” isn’t true?

reply

Marriage, at least in most western traditions that I know of, is a public thing. There must be witnesses. Why is that?

We don't just make an agreement in private and tell our spouse that we are committed to them.

I think this is because humans recognize that we change with time. We may have a certain attitude now, but we are making a commitment for life and it is pretty much impossible to know who you will be or how you will feel twenty years from now.

So does the fact that we need to have witnesses for a marriage to be legal cheapen what a marriage is or mean that we weren't really committed when we said "I do"? I don't think so. Because a marriage is as much an aspiration as it is a commitment. The fact that we do it in public helps us make it real even in private.


Now as to censorship resistance: in a marriage you at least know who you are entering into relationship and you have the ability to choose them.

In a permissionless system like bitcoin, we are making the censorship resistance commitment to anyone who wants to join both now and in the future. We are even making the commitment to people who may want to harm us or destroy bitcoin itself.

We may be fully committed to censorship resistance, but without some kind of public, objective rule set, we'd be vulnerable to constant disputes about what actually constitutes censorship. But even worse, we'd have no way to say to the person who joins the network and actually wants to censor -- "that's a violation of the agreement."

You hit on this in your initial comment

is that itself a form of censorship?

No, because we all agree to something when we start -- but we only know thus because there is a set of rules that we can point to and say this is what we mean.

reply

I don't think all the "we"s in that comment refer to the same group of people.

reply
62 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 28 Sep

I also replied this to @grayruby on nostr:

Imagine there’s a magic website that cannot be taken down, everybody has full control over what you can view on it after they said they care about censorship resistance and there’s also a magic way to detect if they start censoring, in which case we “undo the censorship” and kick them out instead.

Would we still need a protocol that enforces that censorship is impossible?

Or I guess what I described would still count as a protocol even if it involves magic 🤔
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 28 Sep

Mhh, I think it does.

Maybe my example here helps to understand my confusion?

reply
73 sats \ 38 replies \ @sox 27 Sep

the sheer sadness that comes with the fact that your pizza delivery is going to be 1 or 2 hours late because it's a saturday ☹️

reply
102 sats \ 37 replies \ @sox 27 Sep

I'll take a pic when it arrives. I got it with bacon, potatoes and smoked Burrata[1]

  1. burrata is a really good piece of Italian cheese tech marvel, it's essentially creamy mozzarella enshrined in a solid mozzarella

reply
20 sats \ 25 replies \ @sox 27 Sep

I wanted to post a pic but they forgot the Burrata, a sad day

reply

Oh man, I would be so mad!

reply
40 sats \ 23 replies \ @sox 27 Sep

they gave me 30 euros, but you can’t put a price on the Burrata betrayal.

My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined.

reply

;( tears for your loss

reply

It's time to play League to make it worse

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @sox 27 Sep

you really want me dead, biting the curb 4k

reply
0 sats \ 19 replies \ @ek 27 Sep

what's your main

wait, which League are talking about

reply

I'm talking about lol (hate) AHAH, I main wukong and fiddlersticks (both jng)

100 sats \ 17 replies \ @sox 27 Sep

we do play two of the most cancerous champs. I main Master Yi and he mains Wukong, Yi's disciple.

I mean you can't go lower than this.

ooh, that's good pizza. I'm jealous of your burrata.

reply

you make me hungry, I haven't eaten yet grr. but I finished setting up my computer corner haha

reply
100 sats \ 8 replies \ @sox 27 Sep

hi pory!! what do you think of the monitor? I hope you didn't have to deal with the cold capacitors problem

reply

Obviously the monitor is the bomb, pure fire, it hasn't given me any problems regarding the capacitors yet and so for the moment everything is more than perfect, thanks again for the gift!

reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @sox 27 Sep

no worries! also something might be up with your wallet, as you’re sending CCs instead of sats.

Might also be the fact that you have to make it always online!

reply

Now that I'm in my new home I can also set up a computer to keep my wallet online, so just enough time to set everything up and everything will be perfect and I can start working again.

reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @sox 27 Sep

get a fucking vps 💀

deleted by author

@Scoresby what size are your posters and can I custom order one that's currently not in shop?

I feel like such a Karen now, lol.

reply
180 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 27 Sep

I love custom orders!

I print 11" x17", but I have a deal with Proof of Ink and he can print at 27" x40."

reply

It's not for me - but I have a friend that will give a house warming party at some point and I thought it'd make a nice gift I'll do the shitty nostr DM once I've figured out logistics :-)

reply


reply

wife and i are are getting ready for the Matrix movies marathon

reply

Wow! That's great!!

reply
214 sats \ 5 replies \ @Car 27 Sep

📀

reply

98 fountain supporters is amazing!

Great work!

reply
42 sats \ 3 replies \ @Car 28 Sep

I think that’s all time zappers not currently. Lol

reply

I know, but it's still an impressive number.

reply
144 sats \ 1 reply \ @Car 28 Sep

We’ve been doing the pod every week since February of 2022. So I think just being consistent is all the battle.

reply

that is some serious showing up!

reply
30 sats \ 6 replies \ @k00b 27 Sep

Saturn would be a great name for a bitcoin product.

reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @AG 27 Sep

why?

reply
207 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 27 Sep

Sat-urn. Sat as in satoshi. Urn is pronounced like earn.

Saturn is the god "of time, generation, dissolution, abundance, wealth, agriculture, periodic renewal and liberation" in Roman mythology.

Also logo/theming would be obvious.

reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @AG 27 Sep

oh gosh! I'd never come up with such an idea! That's make much more sense now, lol!

It reminds me of your Sat-urday newsletter! That's great too...

reply
47 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 27 Sep

Saturn.com is owned by GM

Satearn.com is Thai packaged food company

reply
50 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 27 Sep

Saturn is a German chain of electronics stores

reply

deleted by author

145 sats \ 8 replies \ @k00b 27 Sep

Got an outrageous bill for Cursor Bugbot again. This time it's worse - they billed me for all 8 licenses they created last month even though we only used 3 licenses this month (after I set restrictions to prevent this).

reply

So much for AI brining deflation to our lives

reply

What are you gonna do? Is customer service a possible thing?

reply

I reached out, got hallucinated instructions about how to remove license seats, told the auto-responder that I wanted a refund or else, then they responded saying they'll connect me with a human.

reply

Did they fix it?

reply
90 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 27 Sep

I'm still waiting on the human

reply

Ah yes, that mythical beast.

reply

Hahahahaha

reply

deleted by author

This book Poor Economics suggested by @Undisciplined is an interesting read so far.

Human action is one hell of a thing.

Still making my way through How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization suggested by @kepford

So far enjoying both books.

reply

I still need to read How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization

I'm glad you're liking Poor Economics. Some of those development econ books bleed together for me, but I think there were a lot of really interesting insights about how people navigate that level of scarcity.

reply

Is Poor Economics a statist book?

reply

Probably to some degree

My recollection is that it's mostly about how very poor people adapt to their environments: how they manage risk, credit, savings, etc.

reply

It's Saturday!

reply

Whenever all is falling I check the bitcoin price and if it is falling then I am relieved that it was the same for everyone

reply

Day 639 of posting mining earnings from the day before: 452 sats on 26Sep2025!
Running total: 418,618 sats!

Yesterday's comment

12 sats \ 2 replies \ @AG0RA 27 Sep

🎁 FREE raffle giveaway SN Holographic Stickers🎁 FREE raffle giveaway SN Holographic Stickers

  1. Follow
  2. ❤️
  3. ♻️ on 𝕏 or 𓅦
  4. Comment with your number and your @nym at #1225577

Ends in 6 hours !

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @AG 27 Sep

Picking up a winner soon! #1239445

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @AG 27 Sep

Raffle participants updated. Feel free to join in plenty of spots still available

reply
36 sats \ 20 replies \ @ek 27 Sep

@siggy47 did you mean replies like this one from me with “articulate, persuasive personality”?

reply

Good example. BTW, the fact that no one could read @Undisciplined's link kind of proves the point.

reply
36 sats \ 18 replies \ @ek 27 Sep

We also fucked up though

@Undisciplined posted a Primal link, but we convert it to an njump link to embed it like twitter links but njump is down failing to load notes.

We should show the original link in that case. @sox is fixing it (even though this wasn’t his mistake).

reply
141 sats \ 17 replies \ @sox 27 Sep

this should do the job

reply
100 sats \ 16 replies \ @ek 27 Sep

looks good, thank you!

reply

From now on if I'm on primal I can just share a note? Usually if I'm scrolling on primal I'll jump to amethyst to grab an njump. BTW, primal probably has a way to grab an njump link, right? I just never know which one to use.

reply
36 sats \ 14 replies \ @sox 27 Sep

You can do that already! Just paste the link, we'll do the work for you.

reply

Thanks for telling me! A while back, maybe almost a year ago, I posted a primal link here and some stackers couldn't read it?