10 sats \ 8 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 29 Apr 2023 \ parent \ on: DarthCoin position regarding AI/chatGPT bitcoin
What is a society? Is not a group of individuals?
If the individuals have high moral ground and education, how will that impact the society?
Society is formed by each individual, not the way around.
Be a sovereign individual with high morals and you will see the results of your "society".
While I think I understand where you're coming from, how likely is it that this may work? How will cost-effective labor not win in a market?
I can choose not to use it, avoiding what ever agenda its creators have made ingrained in it. But the problem with AI is its evolution, I may not use chat GPT but how will I avoid a super general artificial intelligence if/when it comes?
I think the better solution here is building open source AI, with publicly available training data though the problem is compute.
reply
No, the solution is not to build another type of AI.
The solution is to be HUMANS and RESIST to be de-humanized.
Is not about WHO created that AI or if is open source or not.
Is about that the AI inside all the aspects of humanity will consume you from inside, until you will not be anymore human.
The human race will not just get extinct because is not using today the AI, it will go extinct exactly because is starting today to accept AI in their day to day life.
All these simple things that many are seeing them as "inoffensive" aspects are actually changing your brain in something meaningless and more powerful for non-human entities.
reply
I understand your sentiment, if AI goes rogue we can never go back.
however, try convincing people around the world not to develop it, it won't work.
given AI's possibility to use as a weapon, no country will ban its development, this isn't replacing CFCs to save the Ozone.
Humanity's own nature may become its end, if the AI turns out to be against us.
Even if your fear is propaganda and conditioning, I think opensource is the best way against that.
We can't stop development of a technology, someone will build it.
Good luck to the human race.
reply
try convincing people around the world not to develop it, it won't work.
Giving up is the solution then? Lamenting that you cannot do anything is exactly what they want you to do. Is the final step into full obedience.
I think opensource is the best way against that.
That's stupid. It doesn't matter if is closed source or open source. It is just against YOU the human.
reply
I don't think opensourcing is "Giving Up", it is the best solution to program an AI without ill intent.
reply
I don't think opensourcing is "Giving Up", it is the best solution to program an AI without ill intent.
reply
You are a lost soul then. You understand nothing from all this discussion.
reply
what about it is exactly anti-human? my understanding so far has been that you meant to say it would poison people's thoughts with ideological propaganda.
another sentiment I'm getting is that AI will overpower us, which is certainly a possibility.
I am not saying we should adopt AI, I'm not saying I want it to take over.
I'm just being realistic. If being realistic and suggesting actual possible solutions to build an AI that has public known motives make me a lost soul then so be it I guess.
If I don't understand what you are referring to when you say its anti human, please elaborate (eg: do you mean it will make humans unable to think for themselves?).
Maybe as you're still somewhat sure I'm a human, you shouldn't give up on me so quick! I think this type of discussion between us human beings is important, and I'm trying to further understand your viewpoint and I believe you're sharing in goodwill, so maybe I'm worth giving the benefit of the doubt as well.
reply