pull down to refresh
125 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 8 Dec 2023 \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon
the difference is you're uploading it to an AWS server of ours, yes.
i would much rather prefer you push your "garbage" to our server(s) so we can hold on to them as long as possible so the theory behind the evergreen content on SN might actually work out one day :)
it's 2023, storage is not the problem.
it's 2023, storage is not the problem.
roger that!
I just wanted to be sure.
reply
still have to look at median image fees so we can fine tune the moment we're going to hit people with fees (/cc @Natalia)
<insert make them pay meme>
:)
reply
crazy idea...
why not charge stackers that are posting a direct upload image instead of a 3rd party hosting?
just 1 sat for the beginning?
reply
with fees, i do mean only direct upload image
why not
UX reasons :)
"i think" there was a lot of discussion regarding this on Github "somewhere" ... you might find it if you're looking for it :)
reply
<insert make them pay meme>
I'm already paying for it hhaha, and still feel like a bit hassle uploading photos somehow, loading took time and would be nice if I could just drop them and upload:)
reply