pull down to refresh

“I am fascinated by Tim May's crypto-anarchy. Unlike the communities traditionally associated with the word "anarchy", in a crypto-anarchy the government is not temporarily destroyed but permanently forbidden and permanently unnecessary. It's a community where the threat of violence is impotent because violence is impossible, and violence is impossible because its participants cannot be linked to their true names or physical locations.”

Insert Photo Here

Can't find One
Okay, so he’s not really ignored. He does appear frequently in those “Who is Satoshi?” speculations, but not nearly as often as Hal Finney, Adam Back or Nick Szabo. The above quote is from his 1998 paper introducing b-money, which Satoshi referenced in the bitcoin whitepaper. Damn, that's a great quote. It should be referenced more often. It would have been nice to include a photo of Mr. Wei, but I couldn't find one. His @nemo-ness is legendary.

B-Money

B-money included the following ideas, which were incorporated in bitcoin a decade later:
Described as "money which is impossible to regulate",  Dai's b-money described the core concepts later implemented in Bitcoin[13] and other cryptocurrencies: • Requires a specified amount of computational work (aka Proof of work). • The work done is verified by the community who update a collective ledger book. • The worker is awarded funds for their effort. • Exchange of funds is accomplished by collective bookkeeping and authenticated with cryptographic hashes. • Contracts are enforced through the broadcast and signing of transactions with digital signatures (i.e., public key cryptography).
You can read more about b-money here.

Pen Pals

Satoshi and Wei Dai emailed each other before the bitcoin whitepaper was published. Watch this video if you want to learn more about their communcations. According to the bitcoin wiki on bitcoin.org:
Wei Dai and Adam Back were the first two people contacted by Satoshi Nakamoto as he was developing Bitcoin in 2008[2] and the b-money paper was referenced in the subsequent Bitcoin whitepaper.[14] In a May 2011 article, noted cryptographer Nick Szabo states: Myself, Wei Dai, and Hal Finney were the only people I know of who liked the idea (or in Dai's case his related idea) enough to pursue it to any significant extent until Nakamoto (assuming Nakamoto is not really Finney or Dai).[15]
Wei Dai is a private guy, but you can read more about his career here.
There's a twitter account that claims to be him. Created in 2015, It was mostly inactive until late November 2023.
The bio links to this website and to this profile on Less Wrong.
Seems like it could be his.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @moel 3 Jan
Some people whom I trust indeed said it is him.
He seems to be interested in quite esoteric subjects so I’m not really keeping tabs on him 🤔
reply
I linked to the website in the post, which is identified as his, but I have not seen that profile.
reply
Definitely going to do more reading into pre-bitcoin and Wei Dai's work. Would love to see more content on SN from the talented @TheVladCostea. He's one of a very few amount of people that have really digested it all and who breaks it down in a simple digestible way for those who haven't the time or done the leg work into Bitcoin's origins. Also planning to read the Genesis Book later tonight.
reply
I just downloaded the files. Some afternoon reading!
reply
31 sats \ 9 replies \ @Fabs 3 Jan
THE GENESIS BOOK! BOO-YAH!, seems like an interesting and slightly technical read?
reply
I'm about 30 pages in. So far straight history. Nothing real technical yet. Enjoyable.
reply
deleted by author
reply
Check @davidw's post. You can download the files.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Fabs 3 Jan
Not up yet, ain't it?
reply
reply
388 sats \ 0 replies \ @davidw 3 Jan
Thanks @siggy47.
Wormhole only allows those files to be up for 24 hours before they self destruct, so grab a copy pronto!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 3 Jan
My hidden hero, thanks (with a spicy "S")!
reply
deleted by author
reply
Yes. I ordered it also.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Meme 6 Jan
Lol he's not hard to find, he works at imperial, a university in London, UK. He's a lecturer there, so that's pretty public facing. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/people/wei.dai1
reply
I'm not sure it's the same guy.
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @Meme 10 Nov
I found the right guy: https://x.com/weidai11 he writes a lot on his blog
reply
Has anyone tried to implement it actually?
reply
Didn’t he turn to shitcoins and participate to Ethereum conferences etc.?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 4 Jan
I think you're thinking of David Chaum
reply
Wouldn't surprise me if some of his stuff was presented at Ethereum conferences by the Ethereum foundation or whomever, after all, Vitalik did use the guy's name in the protocol for Ethereum (wei represents the smallest unit of ETH used for gas/sending transactions, "gwei" represents 1,000 wei, etc.)
reply
Very possibly. He wouldn't be the first. Do you have a link or reference?
reply
You can read about some of his publications about Ethereum and “public blockchains” at https://wdai.us/posts/. I think he treats topics that will be relevant for the Bitcoin protocol as well. Nevertheless, they are presented at Eth’s conferences and shared by the Ethereum foundation’s YT channel.
In general, he seems pretty close to and willing to work on Turing-complete chains, something that Satoshi deliberately chose to avoid.
I don’t see anything wrong with it, I just hope Satoshi is still among us coding on Bitcoin and didn’t change his mind on such an important piece of Bitcoin’s architecture. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter.
reply
deleted by author
reply
We won't know either way. He holds the cards.
reply
reply