Covert cowboy mode was activated by @nemo and myself as an experiment… sometimes it’s there and sometimes it’s not lol.
What lessons have been learned from this experiment?
reply
This is entirely unscientific but….
People aren’t interested if you have a hat or not when it comes to rewarding your commenting They may be bothered in a cluttered feed when it comes posts and just ignore you.
Reputation carries you further than a chapeau…. but a hat doesn’t hurt if you are new. Best evidenced in the Saloon.
In conclusion; everyone should get a hat, hang on to it, when people know who you it can be hidden but it doesn’t make much of a difference by that point.
Does that make sense?
reply
That actually summarizes my filtering process pretty well. It also affects whether or not I zap a pretty marginal comment.
reply
I suspect there may be a good portion of blind zapping some content in the ‘hot’ or ‘recent’ feeds based on whether the OP has a hat - the theory being those posts may gain more traction. But I am really not sure.
Having a hat does go some way to informing me if I should read your post… the other is title. But if it’s a link you better have added some value or context. Or it’s no zaps for you!
reply
If it's a link, I pretty much need to see a cowboy hat and a compelling title and a name I recognize.
Nobody gets blind zaps from me, but if it's not in "hot" or "recent", I'm not going to see it.
reply
I think we are pretty much agreed on that.
Taking the Wild West angle a touch further; if I rode into town after some time away and there was a newbie, no hat on, quoting some old nonsense from the usual news sources I would walk straight past to the saloon. On the way I pass Sheriff @siggy47 ,his massive hat on and he shouts ‘Hey Carlos, you heard about that story. It’s hilarious. Damn fool Eli Muskrat bought a bar and burnt it down…. tried to sell everyone on fake dog coins.’ I would stop, listen… and probably buy him a drink…
Anyway, I am clearly procrastinating when I should be studying. Apologies!
reply