... Or should I say Booking?.. π€«
I've chosen to start this journey with Harari's book "Sapiens", and it's been a good choice so-far.
I've read more than half of the book's 509 pages in under three days, which might sound like Rookie-numbers to some, but for me it's quite the achievement.
Especially the first eight chapters really intrigued me, chapters nine - twelve were still interesting enough, but not as good as the first eight. The chapters I'm currently reading aren't that interesting to me yet, I hope that there'll be a change in that soon.
The more "interesting" chapters discussed the cognitive and agricultural revolution, the current chapters discuss the scientific revolution, which as paradox as it sounds was the one I initially had the highest hopes for... π
There's still a solid 180-or-so pages left, which I'm hoping to not only get to enjoy more than the ones I just read, but also finish before Friday.
I'm thinking about writing a summary about the things I've learned from the book, especially the first twelve chapters would be well-worth the effort I think (at least for me), and depending on how the following chapters evolve, maybe these too will earn a place in my summary. πΆβπ«οΈ
Started to get frustrated that I couldn't really speak intelligently on most of the books I'd been reading, even though I felt like they impacted me while I read them.
Summaries are going to be my take on trying to speak "intelligently" about the books I'll read, maybe something for you, too?
It's a pretty time-consuming task, but once finished it'll be a useful resource, or so I hope. π₯²
What about you guys?
Would you be interested in a very detailed review about this book's contents?
AI revolution
disrupting whole ecosystems economic structures daily routines causing further social disparities less-or-more like useless-servants-to-our-own-inventions paradigm-shifts logarithmic compounding recurrence while exploring notions such as biohacking extending lifespan achieving digital immortality; Yet Harari cautions us about potential ethical dilemmas arising from these advancements too zestily point out fragility in decision-making capabilities long-run-compromises outweigh immediate benefits advocating constant monitoring over their application and devolved, shared knowledge allocation of re-distribution resources.