pull down to refresh
271 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 13 Feb \ parent \ on: Stacker News For Writers BooksAndArticles
So you're talking more about a new post type? Which can be edited indefinitely with no changelog?
Else I don't get how a changelog for everything (no need to determine beforehand if you want to edit this item in the future or not) would interfere with your use case.
Let's say I have a post with linked posts contained within it, like an index. Then let's say the stacker deletes that post and I want to replace it with a different link. It would be cluttered and pointless to have change logs visible if these updates are made frequently.
reply
It would be cluttered and pointless to have change logs visible if these updates are made frequently.
Yeah, I agree. But that's what I am trying to figure out: how to make it not cluttered and not pointless in general. I imagine "infinite edits" could generally be useful. We usually don't build something for, let's say, a very specific use case.
But maybe we can just implement this with no changelog (would also make it easier) and then iterate from there.
reply
That's a good idea, and I don't want to complicate your life, but you are right about the importance of change logs if we're going to have limitless edits. I also worry it could fuck up discussions if the op is editing on the fly while people are responding to the original text. The current limit is a nice compromise. I'm really talking about a different type of post, not one that is necessarily meant to invite discussion. It is probably too much to ask.
reply