pull down to refresh
1311 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 22 Feb freebie \ on: Bitcoin 'unstoppability' as tea party bitcoin
Your point of view reminds me of what I was thinking a week or so ago when the US mining surveys were issued. The writing is on the wall. I can't help thinking "you ain't seen nothing yet" . I got some pushback for saying mining companies should leave. Many people thought it was worthwhile to fight. As you point out, the rule of law can be completely ignored at the regime's whim. I think of Hayek's sly roundabout language and apply it to leaving jurisdictions BEFORE the shooting starts. Decentralization in all respects is necessary. Live to fight another day.
I totally agree. Why stay and fight when you can leave and fight? Don't we want to reward friendly jurisdictions and punish hostile ones?
These people want wealth and don't care how they get it. If "allowing" bitcoin makes them wealthier, then they'll allow it and we won't have to fight.
reply
These exact same fights are going to happen in AI....and its entirely possible these fights force pushback from the states.
Texas (and other energy rich states) may pass state laws that nullify or otherwise ignore fed rules. If enough states join a coalition (like what has happen with the border issue), the feds will be forced to back down.
reply