@moneyball: How should @stacker_news integrate with nostr?

@fiatjaf: I've been trying to convince @k00b for years! I think it would be a great fit. Just move the entire Stacker News content to a custom Nostr relay, make the default client talk primarily to that relay -- but configurable. Then add some extra proprietary quirks on top. | : The main point is that it would be interoperable with the external Nostr network. Other people would be able to comment on Stacker News content from outside, and vice-versa. | : If Stacker News link posts were made like https://nostr-comments.web.app https://github.com/saiy2k/nostr-comments-widget-react then people would be able to comment from normal twitter-like clients even.

@dksf: in a noisy world Stacker News would provide a lot of signal

@nvk: Don’t stop there, add cashu tokens or LN self hosted instead of IOUs.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 8 Mar
Other people would be able to comment on Stacker News content from outside, and vice-versa.
Seems like we're mostly only missing the ability from nostr > SN since SN > nostr already works (but still room for improvement as always)
No need to rebuild SN on nostr in that case. I don't see why you need to run a nostr relay if you just want to integrate / be interoperable with nostr:
Just move the entire Stacker News content to a custom Nostr relay
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @AG 8 Mar
missing the ability from nostr > SN
I honestly would not suggest that. SN it's nice because does not have all that noise. But it will be really cool to have a full working SN > nostr integration
I don't see why you need to run a nostr relay
Because you want still people to pay Xsats for posting and commenting, if SN own and manage a relay I think it would be possible. So keep what's generated inside Sn in the SN relay, but also enable to be broadcasted in the network.
reply