pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 9 replies \ @frostdragon 1 Apr \ parent \ on: Million Sat Madness 2 - Is it necessary for stackers to hide their identity? meta
Yeah no idea, I wasn't as high as 30, but I was in the top 40 or 50. Unless something crazy happened last minute, I should have gotten a few thousand sats, but I'm guessing they're still working out the kinks.
As of now I can confirm that the winners upto rank 25 have been awarded.
The breking news is this that @siggy47 was the winner.
The runnerup was @Undisciplined
reply
How did you confirm that information?
reply
I can tell you, if you confirm that you were the runner up.
reply
Confirmed. I'm not hiding though, so you can infer that from the ludicrous number of sats I've stacked already this month.
reply
Bingo! You just got me. Yes you aren't hiding but that's a serious jump. You weren't in top 3 positions. How come this happen?
Congratulations 👏👏
reply
I'm guessing it's related to why so many other people ended up in quite different positions than they expected.
My assumption is that something's off with the rewards estimates and real-time rankings.
So, how do you know that Siggy won or that the top 25 all got paid out? Many of them were hiding.
reply
reply
Who else than @siggy47.
He remained so constant all through the last month.
Top 25 because I have talked with lower ranked winners, and they all have denied. Also the current leaderboard explains it as well.
reply