pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @didiplaywell OP 28 May \ parent \ on: The Paradox of Bitcoin Adoption bitcoin
Yes, exactly. My point remains the exact same.
No because then you argument was on volatility and not trend.
And when I said trend, it is only on the supply side. Unless you think an economy running on BCH would somehow be deflationary as well.
reply
No, the trend makes for the volatility too. They are not unrelated. A trend towards a deflationary economy diminishes volatility. A trend towards an inflationary economy augments it. It's impossible to pretend to eliminate any possible trace of noise, that's for granted. And I never meant that. What I specifically stated was: volatility unbearable to allow full adoption.
reply
I do data analysis and finance, so you can obviously tell from the whole conversation how confusing it is.
A predictable trend can be plotted with a formula. Volatility is variance, stand deviation of this trend.
You can look at historical record to predict the rate of volatility, but it is still a variance on the trend.
inflationary or deflationary does not decrease or increase volatility, volatility depends on the trading. Bitcoin has a predictable money supply rate, it does not make it less volatile since traders gonna trade along with it.
you cannot fix it even if full adoption happens.
reply
Again, I'm in no way pretending to eliminate any possible source of noise so that a tendency is a perfect mathematical line with zero variance. I said "volatility unbearable to allow full adoption", not absence of volatility. We can't say "USD haves a 2% volatility rate, BTC 50%, so since they both have volatility, bot are equally bad/god as units of account, no distinction, you can use either USD or BTC to set prices right now, won't note a difference". As for "inflationary or deflationary does not decrease or increase volatility", that's just not true, I can tell you from first hand experience in Argentina.
reply
inflationary or deflationary does not decrease or increase volatility Volatility does not need to be going down in value, if bitcoin can pump 50% in a month, that's an extreme volatile for an economy. And vice versa.
reply
Again, we are not debating Bitcoin as an asset, but as a unit of account.
reply
An asset is what it is. Unit of account is its function
reply
That's not an arbitrary decision. An asset can or can not qualify as a unit of account. If it does, it can be used as currency. Bitcoin doesn't, yet. Bitcoin arriving there, is what the paradox is about.