Honestly, this is the TLDR on most global conflict. It doesn't explain HOW wars are started and promoted but be sure that those that profit most have the most to lose from peace. Following the money is always a good lens to use.

Globalists want less wars because they are pro open borders. That's LITERALLY what the word means, like it's already in the word itself.

You can't just slap <People I don't like> on every <thing I don't like> like whatever. That's such an 80-IQ way of thinking

💯🏦🥃☎️

This is the realist view of foreign relations and it seems to be the way Putin and Trump view foreign relations. In my opinion when people ignore this lens when view conflict they are missing a huge obvious angle. In order to understand conflict and relations I think one should know how to use multiple lens. Then you begin to understand the many sides in a much more detailed light.

Countries go to war due to fear, honor or interest

Thucydides

Fear of NATO expansion Russian power and prestige Oil fields Buffer zone and a neutral Ukraine

On point, America wants the Europe divided and cutting the cheap Russian gas flowing West is part of the plan (remember the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage promised by Biden? well it happened). Combined with green hysteria, the EU and especially Germany is deindustrializing, well done. FYI EU, the US are not your friend

WW1 was also unnecessary especially for the British and Americans

America entered the war in 1917 to make the world 'safe for democracy'... whatever the hell that means

If Britain stayed out or reached a ceasefire in 1916, Germany would have accepted. France would have lost some territory including Alsace Lorraine.

If all parties agreed to a ceasefire in 1916 or before the October Revolution would have failed.

Austria Hungary would have created a federation consisting of Austria, Hungary, Croatia, Poland, Czech and Slovakia

Ottoman Empire was already a sick empire. Let them deal with Arab grievances and demand for sovereignty.

No Sykes Picot agreement, no Balfour Declaration, no Israel lobby in America, etc

1994 Budapest memorandum?

Every time they say propaganda, you can be very sure they are lying especially when it comes to Russia (e.g., Russia election collusion fabrication...). When Russia says "Niet" to NATO extension to Georgia and Ukraine, you know it cannot end well. This was 2008 or 2009 and part of revelations from wikileaks, instead of locking-up Julian Assange they should read what it said. Russia has not prepared its economy for a full war like Nazi Germany did in the 30s and Putin is not that stupid. It is a regional conflict that can be easily resolved if people sit on a table (which Russia and Ukraine did in Istanbul in March 2022 but that Biden and Johnson manage to sabotage), maybe it will happen again when the US have a president knowing where he is

Hopefully you are not one of the "some people". Let's think about the country who was involved in nearly every war in the last 20 years. And every war was build on lies. People who are still believing the official story are just lost.

Maidan color revolution

I say coup

Potato 🥔 tomato 🍅

But what do you think? You can vote. No need to reply. Or do neither.

Yes to installing nuclear missiles

Russia has more oil than it can use, so that's retarded... citing perhaps egress for nat gas pipelines to europe, or the river system would at least show some grip on the logistics... no need to fabricate ones

Huffing those Atlantic Council farts really hard eh?

Oil fields were a factor but not the main factor

NATO and Russia have a recent history.

1949 to present