64 sats \ 5 replies \ @south_korea_ln OP 27 Aug \ parent \ on: Drained SN wallet, connected with NWC for send & lightning address for receive bitcoin
This is the point of testing things out. It's by reporting issues that things will iron out.
Why don't we make SN wallet non custodial?
What do you mean? This is exactly what is being done here by connecting to external (custodial or non custodial wallets).
write
preview
44 sats \ 4 replies \ @IamSINGLE 27 Aug
I mean SN creates a non custodial wallet of/on its own.
reply
271 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln OP 27 Aug
That's a whole project on its own :) makes more sense to let people choose their preferred non-custodial wallet that have a dedicated team to develop it
reply
149 sats \ 1 reply \ @sidshattuck 27 Aug
It doesn't work like that I'm afraid
reply
242 sats \ 0 replies \ @supertestnet 27 Aug
It can work like that but it's very hard. The mutiny team showed it's possible to make a self custodial LN wallet for the browser. But then they stopped because because they think it's too hard of a problem to solve at scale. So I guess their story is evidence for both things: it's technically possible but (arguably) not in a practical way
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 27 Aug
That's not a simple matter. I'm still holding out hope that @Alby will consider a custom SN solution.
reply