pull down to refresh

43 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 15 Sep \ parent \ on: Caveat Using Alby Hub To Connect To SN? meta
IMHO any zaps under the "dust" threshold of 540 sats must be custodial. IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE to send a 1-10-100 sats zap over SN in a non-custodial manner. I think people do not read how HTLCs works, really.
WHO the fuck cares that I sent you 100 sats zap over SN? Who the fuck cares how I use my sats? I want to challenge any gov agent to show me that bullshit law where any gov agency can have any so called authority over my own cowboy credits...
But yeah, people are afraid to ask so fucking obvious and simple questions and just get along with the fucking COMPLIANCE!
I AM SO TIRED OF SO MANY PUSSIES IN THIS WORLD!
write
preview
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 OP 15 Sep
I didn't realize "dust" could be an issue on LN. I will have to read up on it, but you're usually right about this stuff.
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 15 Sep
LN transactions are actually onchain "not-yet-broadcasted" transactions. That means are still under the dust threshold rule. That doesn't mean you can't do it, only that are not "incentivized" to be stolen. It will cost more to stole a dust tx than to close a channel.
That's why I will say it LOUD: custodial accounts under 50-100k, even 1M ARE JUST FINE! And not just that, but will relax a bit all this crazy-mania with self-custody.
Yes, self-custody is a must, but not for meaningless and joke money.
reply