pull down to refresh

58 sats \ 2 replies \ @Taft 18 Oct \ parent \ on: Zapping More Might Solve Our Leader Board Wizard Issue meta
Leaderboard should be disabled totally. The game is not to be on the leader board, but to make Bitcoin useful.
I agree. In comment @k00b said that this:
Imo The biggest mistake we made was back in march when we capped rewards to the top 100. Someone getting even a few sats for the first time gives them some hope they’ll learn how to earn more #713031.
When I asked him why you don't change it, he replayed:
It's just not trivial and we have other things to do that have higher priority #713518.
I hope they will find time to change it as it was before.
write
preview
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 18 Oct
That's the plan.
reply
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 18 Oct
We could have countless games and ways to reward stackers on SN... I even proposed a Quiz post option, where participants could earn sats for finishing the quiz. Also I proposed the Badges system, that could start as incentive and later in trading badges...
The options are many, but the leader board is only confusing and create useless friction and false hope for earning sats.
Making the game harder will make people to appreciate more each fucking sat they get. Now is too simple to earn sats on SN, and is wrong.
reply