13 sats \ 8 replies \ @Satosora 7 Nov \ parent \ on: Political Polarization Relatively Strong in the U.S. Politics_And_Law
These are my own thoughts, but CA could never run without the government subsidies.
It doesnt even have its own water supply.
If it were to break away, it would just flounder.
Texas on the other hamd, l could see it breaking away and being successful.
From what l have seen, they have quite a bit of independent thinkers there.
There are other nations that don't have abundant fresh water. CA could continue purchasing water from AZ or ramp up its desalination industry.
They would need economic policy reforms to deal with the loss of federal welfare funding, but CA still contains a lot of wealth and even more unutilized productive potential.
reply
reply
That's true, but it wouldn't necessarily be a deal breaker. California would still be one of the wealthiest countries on Earth. Europe is substantially poorer than California, for instance.
reply
reply
California became wealthy through genuine economic productivity and has devolved into a welfare state. That's very similar to the story in much of Europe.
My point is that California wouldn't be any worse off than a typical European nation. That may be worse than its current situation, but it's not really a complete collapse.
reply
reply
These are all reversible short-term issues, though. I'm not aware of any reasons that CA can't get better, but they will have to work through these problems. That's true whether or not they're independent. The state is on a major decline and that will likely result in a bunch of government defaults on various financial obligations.
reply