Not sure if this is related to my warning about SN "self-custody". Seems to be more related with your phoenixd node. idk how well is supporting phoenixd hold invoices.
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 13 Nov
Not sure if this is related to my warning about SN "self-custody".
Yes it is since if I understood you correctly, you argue that "self-custody" (like running a phoenixd node) is too hard for stackers (or even the lightning network itself?) and they should just use cowboy credits like you.
idk how well is supporting phoenixd hold invoices.
Hold invoices don't need to be "supported", they work by simply delaying releasing the preimage. Don't you know this? Or you mean how much ACINQ supports likes locked up liquidity?
reply
ofc I know how hold invoices are working. I was playing with a phoenixd node too (not phoenix wallet), using robosats hold invoices. And the failure rate was way more higher than with other LND/CLN nodes.
So then I tried to avoid using phoenixd / phoenix wallet with hold invoices. I think is related with the CLTV, maybe you could try a larger CLTV.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 13 Nov
Ah, that's what you mean, makes sense.
I had the same experience on robosats with phoenix wallet and I think both use the same code.
I think in this case here, it's just my server being slow.
reply
I use CCs for my own reasons. Nothing related with lack of knowledge about LN of many stackers here. That is another story.
Even the easiness of running a phoenixd node is way too much for many SN users that don't even have a WoS. Many don't even have a proper PC at home and you want them to run a node. hahahaha
You really super-estimate the SN users.
reply