"Times are bad. Children no longer obey their parents, and everyone is writing a book.” ― Marcus Tullius Cicero
For modern generations, we could probably change the last bit to 'making a tiktok', instead of a book, but the point stands.
It seems like all older generations see the next generation as soft, weak, decadent, or a combination of all of them.
My question is, are we always getting softer on aggregate? Ii mean I'm sure a ww2 vet would be horrified at my lack of ability to survive in the woods, then again, maybe it's just because as time goes by, we just have different things we prioritize that make us money or help us relax?
I mean, I even think of my 20-something cousins as soft af because they have zero attention span and can't even have a normal human-human interaction without a device.
What do you guys think?
this territory is moderated
176 sats \ 5 replies \ @k00b 3h
I think every generation is that self-centered.
  • "We live in the most important time in history"
  • "We have it tough"
  • "We are tough"
  • "Those other generations are lazy"
  • "Those other generations had it easy"
  • "The time I'm living in is different. It's like no other time that's ever existed in history"
reply
one thing is for sure, a couple of hundred years ago, things didn't change that much between generations, the pace of change we've seen maybe the past 100 years has been crazy
reply
Old man be like : jeez today's kids getting wealthy by tapping this ⚡️ button on some place they yell SN
reply
43 sats \ 2 replies \ @zapsammy 2h
it's a pay to post platform for getting richer in smarts, not richer in so-called money.
(oh no, the dark side has gotten to Sammy)
reply
23 sats \ 1 reply \ @Imyourfed 1h
I know was just kidding man! Would a 80 year old man who don't know a shit about btc would understand it? He would just say kids are making few bucks! That's it!
getting richer in smarts, not richer in so-called money
Very well said!
reply
reply
74 sats \ 0 replies \ @jk_14 2h
see testosterone decline:
"For decades, testosterone levels have been declining. Your grandad may not have been quite as swift with Excel, but he probably one-upped you where T levels are concerned.
It’s normal for testosterone levels to decline as you get older, but for some reason, there’s been a population-level drop with each generation, at least since the 70s [1–4]. This means, on average, Gen Zers and millennials have significantly lower testosterone levels compared to their predecessors."
reply
Older people always think the subsequent generations are idiots. They even say so but at heart they know the subsequent generations are always gonna be better.
This is what my father says after he has used two or three Hindi slangs (abusive words).
We have a proverb that says "Sitar ka goo, na lipan ka na potan ka" loosely translates as "you're turned into shit of a dog, not of any use." They say this for they want everything to be done as they want it to be done.
I'm not against any older generations but morality is transferred the old to the young. The west that is now subject to this young-old differences, imo, is because the west don't have a system of Joint Family.
In short, I don't see a typical Indian family doesn't have this dilemma.
reply
that's a pretty harsh proverb lol
reply
17 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 3h
Technology improves standard of living so the next generation will typically have more tools to access to make their lives easier. Does that make them soft. Probably.
It likely takes war or crisis to find out though.
reply
That's the line I was thinking along, too.
If you took someone from now and put them in a previous generation, their reaction would likely be that it's tougher to live like that.
If you take someone from a past generation and put them in the present, we know that they will tend to find it confusing.
reply
63 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 3h
"when I was your age..." I heard that every day as a kid. Now I use it
reply
40 sats \ 2 replies \ @Myshkin 3h
When we study historical events, we struggle to grasp how human life was considered back in the days. Life was meaningless but also precious. In ancient roman times or during the middle ages, your best friend would have killed you if your two families had some sudden litigation. People used to kill for honor, for futile things like looking someone in the eyes or not crossing a road to show respect.
But life also had a meaning, life meant something every day: sufferings were meaningful, the daily grind was precious. Rest time was so scarce that the pleasure of it was unbarable. Having a piece of red meat once a month was an opportunity for a party.
Now we are not soft, we are simply despaired and without meaning. And we try to tell ourselves that mankind has never seen such progress, such wealth, such technological achievements. That may be true - although I have some doubts. What is also true is that we lost our relationship with the Five Senses.
We watch but generally don't see; we hear but we generally don't listen. We touch but don't feel. Anything seems to have lost its smell and its taste. Our softness is predicated on that, nothing seems scarce, so our westerners sick brains started giving most things for granted. And we give for granted the Google Maps help, so we don't care to remember routes; give food for granted, so we generally don't remember the taste of the steak we eat nor the taste of the eggs.
Softness is not predicated on the fact that we don't have wolves or bears looking actively for our flash. Softness is not predicated on the fact that we don't have an enemy soldier aiming at our windows with their sniper. Softness is in the Grey.
Our parents didn't live through wars, they are relatively young. Possibly, they never suffered thirst nor hunger. They lived though the daily grind of western human life as all of us today are doing, but they are not soft. They fight for what they believe is true, they stand for themselves and for their ideas. They don't punch people because they don't agree with them, even though muscles are not lacking under the skin.
That's not softness, it's lack of A battle to fight. Once you have something to aim for, your softness disappears. Even if you're a thin adolescent in a 21st century western wealthy country.
reply
the lack of a battle to fight is a thing for sure, it;s like if a younger generation doesn't have a good cause to rally behind , they find something, or just become apathetic slugs
reply
It seems to me that we're failing the challenge Nietzsche set up: the death of God means that individuals need to find meaning within themselves, or Ideology could rise (as marxism did). We're testifying the inhabiliy of human beings to find meaning with introspection and no God.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @wilto 3h
It really depends on the country, culture, and the level of parental involvement in their education. However, if kids are growing up spending too much time watching TV, browsing YouTube, Tik Tok, Neftflix and whatever nonsense and generally being online much of their spare time —with little outdoor exercise or social interaction—it's not surprising that they might be seen as 'soft'.
reply
In that you are right, the country and the culture have a lot to do with it. Well, in Latin America we have always tried to create an active entrepreneurial society. I wouldn't know how to talk about Europe or Asia because I have never been there.
reply
32 sats \ 3 replies \ @anon 1h
These days 75% of kids age 17 to 24 are ineligible for military service due to obesity, drugs, physical and mental health problems, misconduct, and aptitude. What does that tell you?
reply
Are this numbers referring to USA?
reply
that we were right all along lol
reply
Tells you universal health care might be on the way in the USA, if the UK history from the Boer war is any example: https://history.port.ac.uk/?p=2264
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @crrdlx 1h
I don't know...but them snowflakes these days!
reply
people getting offended at everything is pretty exhausting
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @Msd0457890 2h
Certainly the current generation has been idiotized by phones, by social networks, by all that, which means that you cannot even have, as you said, a social interaction without any device. Many people live in their virtual world, in that world that has them asleep. Certainly past generations focused on love, on interacting and being a better society.
reply
previous generations would be able to survive in more situations i think for sure, basic survival etc. we're more abstracted away from a lot of things, myself included , although i can at least maintain a social interaction
reply
It's not a line but a cycle: hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, weak men create hard times.
Here in Argentina the younger generations see the previous ones, their fathers specially (our boomers), as weak and naive. And they are right. In today's political arena the teenagers are the sharpest, and boomers are helpless.
reply
Doesnt each generation think the previous generation to be archaic? While the previous generation thinks the new generation has become soft? I dont diagree with both points, but l believe there is a bit of truth in both.
reply
They simultaneous think the younger generation are softer, but also more dangerous.
They consider younger generations weaker, but also more criminal.
Less able to survive, but somehow dominating and threatening to the current order.
Any time you see someone arguing these kinds of contradictions you know they're a fool.
reply
"times are bad, children no longer know their gender or their parents, and everyone has a podcast they listen to or host."
people under mind control are not normal. they experience a dis-ease of the mind, due to toxic attacks in the stories, air, water, and food. it's very hard to maintain higher spiritual vibrations under constant bombardment, with little time to reflect. original thought is almost absent, it's usually a regurgitation of someone else's thoughts, and where did they get theirs?
older folks are stuck in their ways, younger folks are confused, and collaboration is absent. where are the grandparents?
reply