pull down to refresh

In addition to proxying payments to attached wallets, if you don't need the privacy or mind the 10% fee, you can receive directly to an attached wallet. e.g. When enabled in your settings, and a deposit will cause your balance to exceed your auto-withdrawal threshold, we will send the payment directly to your attached wallet ... note: this won't be very useful until you'd otherwise receive cowboy credits.
If you have multiple sending wallets attached, we will try to pay with each in priority order until the payment succeeds or we run out of sending wallets to try. (via @ek)
Create custom invite codes with private descriptions (via @rblb)
Then we have lots of small improvements:
  • log payment rejections due to fees (via @ek)
  • fix and improve LNC attached wallet (via @rblb)
  • wallet display filters for send/receive (via @ek)
  • fix adding images in the middle of text (via @Soxasora)
  • fix deposit notifications (via @rblb)
  • allow filtering for unpaid bounties only (via @aegroto)
  • fix territories not being refreshed on settings change (via @aegroto)
  • territory popover on hover (via @felipe)
  • check auth on invite revocation (via @rblb)
  • progress bar on back (via @aegroto)
  • fix failed post payments showing in top (via @Soxasora)
  • allow iOS video uploads (via @Soxasora)
  • fix edit timer sticking at 00:00 (via @ek)
  • fix specific wallet log deletion (via @ek)


I'll pay out bounties for all the fixes in this release after posting this.
Since starting the Open Source Contributor Award Rules (OSCARs), we've paid a total of 13.8m sats to 32 contributors for 146 contributions! View an up to date list of contribution awards here: https://github.com/stackernews/stacker.news/blob/master/awards.csv

Previous release: #776217

hey @rblb is it you that you did the PR #1421 - personalized invite links?
reply
Yep
reply
He deserves more those sats than me. I just made the PR not the hard work with the code. Will send him the sats.
reply
1000 sats \ 1 reply \ @rblb 8 Dec
Thank you, I'm glad you liked the result! @k00b already compensates me generously, so i think a better use for those sats would be to put them on an invite link to onboard newbs.
But if you have more feature requests in mind, feel free to open issues, I am not working directly on the p2p (ex-nov-5) update, so I'll have time to look into them🫡
reply
put them on an invite link to onboard newbs.
Yeah I was thinking about that. I want to create some specific beefy links and track them for a while. In the past I did a mistake and shared an invite link on a public place and lots of links were just milked but very few end up in real stackers. I will not do that mistake anymore.
reply
I pay him a salary
reply
Then I want to bribe him 😂 ah shit, sending sats internally it doesn't work anymore? What have you done @k00b?
reply
It works for me sending to rblb@stacker.news. I'm not sure what you could be doing differently.
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 8 Dec
Looks like a LUD-18 bug. Sending with just a comment works
reply
not working for me. maybe because he have an external wallet attached ? I tried also to another SN account that I know it doesn't have a wallet attached and also it didn't worked.
17 sats \ 2 replies \ @Cje95 5 Dec
Great to see iOS video uploads coming out! I look forward to using that big time!
reply
33 sats \ 1 reply \ @Soxasora 5 Dec
let’s see if iOS doesn’t pull any other joke👀
reply
32 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cje95 5 Dec
I updated my phone yesterday and regret it... Why on Gods Green Earth did they need to screw with how EVERYTHING looks.... Sometimes I just hate technology
reply
17 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 5 Dec
Do invite links work yet with attached wallets?
reply
They’ll work with cowboy credits when we ship those in a couple weeks.
reply
16 sats \ 1 reply \ @Shugard 5 Dec
What a cool feature! I will be playing with it in the near future!
reply
which?
reply
It's still possible to edit posts after 10 minutes with the edit command. I've just done it in this post: #804709 cc/ @ek
reply
I edited this one after 51 minutes! (edit cmd) #804660
reply
11 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 16h
You sure you didn’t just pay less than 10 minutes again?
But thanks, will take a look
reply
I'm sure in both cases! But the 51-minute one is no contest! Ahahah try your self.
reply