pull down to refresh

34 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 28 Dec \ parent \ on: Why Did the Accuser in the Duke Lacrosse Case Recant? Some Answers Politics_And_Law
Yes, you couldn’t say otherwise, no matter the evidence that was brought out. One kid wasn’t even there when she was! It was a huge shock to hear of acquittal. You are right about what people think when they heard Duke Lacrosse. It is now about 20 years later and they are finally cleared by a liar.
write
preview
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 28 Dec
Maybe cleared officially, but still permanently smeared and stigmatized.
reply
41 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 28 Dec
I don’t know how they are doing now. I haven’t heard. This is the problem with “always believe the woman”. I think you see a lot of it going on in family courts, too. I guess dishonesty has a reward and as long as someone is paying it, there will be dishonesty. Until strong, adversarial cross-examinations are allowed, there will be lies.
reply