pull down to refresh

"won't CCs just accumulate to infinity?"
If I receive CCs daily but never zap them because I have an attached wallet wouldn't this be the case?
This is why I am donating them to rewards pool to turn them back into sats.
108 sats \ 1 reply \ @Aardvark 8 Jan
You can disable your wallet temporarily and it will exclusively send CC. It's just a check box on the settings. You can send them directly back out into circulation.
I think after a while, most people won't care if they get zapped CC's, there's enough ways to use them that it shouldn't matter.
reply
Good idea.
reply
639 sats \ 9 replies \ @k00b OP 8 Jan
You're right. If you somehow end up spending fewer CCs than you receive, they will accumulate. For those of us with attached wallets, you could adjust your dust limits to discharge more of them in small zaps.
Personally, I have 7 CCs right now. I'd guess the folks that have so many that they're suffering a cowboy credit cognitive crisis aren't very big zappers/spenders. They're getting less assmilk per squeeze I'd guess and are parched.
reply
In a surprise upset, this is now my favorite k00b comment, which is remarkable given the competition over the years.
reply
it's incredibly poetic. Three levels of funzies with the assmilk metafor
reply
I think eventually most stackers will attach wallets.
reply
They're getting less assmilk per squeeze I'd guess and are parched.
The visuals.
reply
People complaining about CCs.
reply
They're getting less assmilk per squeeze I'd guess and are parched.
ROFL beautifully put
reply
they're suffering a cowboy credit cognitive crisis aren't very big zappers/spenders. They're getting less assmilk per squeeze I'd guess and are parched.
Definitely. Only those will moan about hoarding CCs who don't like to spend by zapping on other's posts and comments.
reply
Hoarding CCs is like hoarding testnet bitcoin 😂😂😂😂😂
reply
They're getting less assmilk per squeeze I'd guess and are parched. dude, BRING OUT THE POETRY more often.
Nice
reply
They’ll still get spent when you post and comment.
reply
Posting fee defaults to CCs?
reply
That's my understanding.
reply
Post I just made used sats but I didn’t have 69 CCs as I donated them all away. I will have to check that tomorrow.
Did you see my post btw?
reply
53 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 8 Jan
You should see it spends CCs first when you comment. Posting has the same behavior.
reply
Sort of. I saw the post, but couldn't see the tweet.
reply
Do you guys like the reporting I did on Black Monday event here #839489 ?
Do you want me to do such reporting of events in future?
reply
yes was good
reply
Thanks. I'll be doing more of such in future. I'm more of a sports guy, so I would be contributing more on ~stacker_sports rather than diffusing my energy elsewhere.
You remember I said, SS must be the place to look for everything that's happening in sports worldwide. I've got an idea of running a daily sports news thread. How about that?
I like the idea of it. For the time being, I can't see any of the embedded tweets. That's a problem on my end, though.
reply
That's weird. Why didn't you see the embedded tweets? Anything I need to do on my end?
53 sats \ 1 reply \ @nym 8 Jan
Yes, I enjoyed reading it when you did.
reply
Thanks. It would be better, had you commented on the post to encourage.
Oh. That’s odd. Anyways, 49ers reporter said 49ers will not bring Sorensen back as DC but hope to retain him at another position.
reply
I haven't been able to view tweets since I switched computers.
reply
You are right. I just did a test post and it pulled from CCs.