pull down to refresh

158 sats \ 17 replies \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb \ on: [REVENUE] 1814 sats - Two days in a row crushing it 💪💪 HealthAndFitness

I recalculated the revenue and it's 2249 sats for yesterday not 1814.

I counted the values for ~healthandfitness as following

  • Post fee = 69
  • Comment fee = 7
  • Zaps = 21% of total sats zapped

So, yesterday's stats stand as:

  • posts = 6×69=414 Sats
  • comm.= 66×7=462 Sats
  • zaps = 6641%21 = 1373 Sats
  • Total = 2249 Sats in revenue.

*This also doesn't include fees and zaps on previous days' posts or comments. If it does, the revenue could be more.
CC: @grayruby @Undisciplined @realBitcoinDog @k00b @ek

Please correct me if I'm wrong at it.

write
preview
93 sats \ 5 replies \ @IamSINGLE 25 Feb

Today's calculation.

54 comments = 378 Sats revenue
5 posts = 345 sats revenue
Zaps = 2568•21% = 539
Total = 1262 Sats.

Zaps breakdown

@grayruby @Undisciplined @realBitcoinDog

reply
35 sats \ 4 replies \ @realBitcoinDog OP 25 Feb

Not what I got just now

reply
43 sats \ 3 replies \ @IamSINGLE 25 Feb

It's 107 Sats less.
It also doesn't include any zaps that cod have happened on any other posts than yesterday's.
There's something missing and noone's from the admins even bothered to address it.

reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 25 Feb

I'll be back thursday. I'll investigate when I get back. ek is/has been taking personal time.

the admins even bothered to address it

This isn't exactly motivating. You've memorably been a huge asshole to me. Don't expect prompt service.

reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @IamSINGLE 25 Feb

deleted by author

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 25 Feb

@k00b's on vacation, still. Not sure about @ek.

I suggest making a ~meta post about this, so the other owners can look into their revenue.

reply
38 sats \ 6 replies \ @grayruby 24 Feb

Did you base yesterday on 12am ct to 12am ct?

reply
61 sats \ 2 replies \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb

I don't know how to do it. I calculated from 11:30AM IST to 11:30AM IST round the clock.

There were 6 posts, 66 comments and 6641 sats zapped within them on this timeframe.

11:30 AM IST is the time when rewards are distributed.

Edit: I've checked that 11:30 IST happens to be 12:AM CT, so I actually set the time.

I calculated from post to post and comment to comment within this timeframe.

reply
19 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 24 Feb

A good test would be to track today’s and see if there is another anomaly.

reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb

This sounds ok. I'll do it again tomorrow at day end.

reply
20 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 24 Feb

I don't think you can set the time, so maybe it is a time-zone issue.

reply
76 sats \ 1 reply \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb

We simply don't need to set the time as I calculated right after the day ended at 12:AM CT or 11:30 IST for me.

I only calculated for the posts and comments and zaps that were made only yesterday within the timeframe of 24 hours.

reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 24 Feb

Can @realBitcoinDog check that the formula works as intended with his forked SN?

reply
19 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 24 Feb

Might some of the zaps occurred today, rather than yesterday?

reply
47 sats \ 2 replies \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb

No. I calculated it right after the day ended.
I even posted it 9 h ago. #895470

You know I and @realBitcoinDog discuss the analytics daily. It happened that I intuitively guessed that we must have a better day than yesterday as I saw more zaps, comments and posts than the previous day. But when I saw him posting the revenue less than the day before yesterday, I was just surprised and did this calculation.

I'm not entirely sure if my method of calculation is completely correct but the stats are 100% correct.

reply
19 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 24 Feb

Interesting, because your method looks right to me.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @realBitcoinDog OP 25 Feb

Not what I got tho

reply