reply on: [REVENUE] 1814 sats - Two days in a row crushing it 💪💪 \ stacker news ~HealthAndFitness

pull down to refresh

158 sats \ 17 replies \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb \ on: [REVENUE] 1814 sats - Two days in a row crushing it 💪💪 HealthAndFitness

I recalculated the revenue and it's 2249 sats for yesterday not 1814.

I counted the values for ~healthandfitness as following

Post fee = 69
Comment fee = 7
Zaps = 21% of total sats zapped

So, yesterday's stats stand as:

posts = 6×69=414 Sats
comm.= 66×7=462 Sats
zaps = 6641%21 = 1373 Sats
Total = 2249 Sats in revenue.

*This also doesn't include fees and zaps on previous days' posts or comments. If it does, the revenue could be more. CC: @grayruby @Undisciplined @realBitcoinDog @k00b @ek

Please correct me if I'm wrong at it.

93 sats \ 5 replies \ @IamSINGLE 25 Feb

Today's calculation.

54 comments = 378 Sats revenue 5 posts = 345 sats revenue Zaps = 2568•21% = 539 Total = 1262 Sats.

Zaps breakdown

#896197 = 167 on post
#896018 228 on post
#895618 = 638 on post and 484 on comments
#895587 = 112 on post and 45 on comments
#895433 = 243 on post and 651 on comments.

@grayruby @Undisciplined @realBitcoinDog

35 sats \ 4 replies \ @realBitcoinDog OP 25 Feb

Not what I got just now

43 sats \ 3 replies \ @IamSINGLE 25 Feb

It's 107 Sats less. It also doesn't include any zaps that cod have happened on any other posts than yesterday's. There's something missing and noone's from the admins even bothered to address it.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 25 Feb

I'll be back thursday. I'll investigate when I get back. ek is/has been taking personal time.

the admins even bothered to address it

This isn't exactly motivating. You've memorably been a huge asshole to me. Don't expect prompt service.

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @IamSINGLE 25 Feb

I expected just a reply not service.

You've memorably been a huge asshole to me.

No bigger than some here are. ;)

And I'm extremely sorry for calling you the emperor (or, may be the king). At the most that's what I can remember memorably.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 25 Feb

@k00b's on vacation, still. Not sure about @ek.

I suggest making a ~meta post about this, so the other owners can look into their revenue.

38 sats \ 6 replies \ @grayruby 24 Feb

Did you base yesterday on 12am ct to 12am ct?

61 sats \ 2 replies \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb

I don't know how to do it. I calculated from 11:30AM IST to 11:30AM IST round the clock.

There were 6 posts, 66 comments and 6641 sats zapped within them on this timeframe.

11:30 AM IST is the time when rewards are distributed.

Edit: I've checked that 11:30 IST happens to be 12:AM CT, so I actually set the time.

I calculated from post to post and comment to comment within this timeframe.

19 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 24 Feb

A good test would be to track today’s and see if there is another anomaly.

50 sats \ 0 replies \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb

This sounds ok. I'll do it again tomorrow at day end.

20 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 24 Feb

I don't think you can set the time, so maybe it is a time-zone issue.

76 sats \ 1 reply \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb

We simply don't need to set the time as I calculated right after the day ended at 12:AM CT or 11:30 IST for me.

I only calculated for the posts and comments and zaps that were made only yesterday within the timeframe of 24 hours.

20 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 24 Feb

Can @realBitcoinDog check that the formula works as intended with his forked SN?

19 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 24 Feb

Might some of the zaps occurred today, rather than yesterday?

47 sats \ 2 replies \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb

No. I calculated it right after the day ended. I even posted it 9 h ago. #895470

You know I and @realBitcoinDog discuss the analytics daily. It happened that I intuitively guessed that we must have a better day than yesterday as I saw more zaps, comments and posts than the previous day. But when I saw him posting the revenue less than the day before yesterday, I was just surprised and did this calculation.

I'm not entirely sure if my method of calculation is completely correct but the stats are 100% correct.

19 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 24 Feb

Interesting, because your method looks right to me.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @realBitcoinDog OP 25 Feb

Not what I got tho