pull down to refresh

Many SN users affected

Suggesting this is a rug is very bad faith. I'm on the Telegram group and the guy is ALWAYS answering to requests from users and everyone is quite happy with the product and the way it's handled. Once they found the problem they immediately disclosed to everyone and are trying to fix it.

I have some sats on Coinos and I fully understand it's a custodial service and there are risks, if you don't understand it that's your problem.

What saddens me is that people trying to build cool things are immediately crushed once there is an issue.

Anon what are your products and what have you done for the community?

reply
15 sats \ 1 reply \ @nout 13 May

I understand your sentiment and I don't think coinos will rug pull. At the same time actual rug pulls have exactly the same story.. "these guys were so helpful in their support channels, they got me really excited. I bet they are working really hard to resolve the issue, but somehow now they are no longer replying, it's probably ok, right?"

Read the replies from victims of actual rug pulls in the past and this is what you will find...

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 13 May

Mhhh, also good point, haha

reply
34 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 13 May
Suggesting this is a rug is very bad faith.

Good point, throwing around serious accusations for fun isn't fun.

reply

I got a response from him today. He's working on it, and he's one person who's provided a great service for...I don't know, it's been at least 6 months or so.

Everyone knows not to put too much faith in custodial services. I didn't have more on there than I would have been willing to lose.

reply
141 sats \ 2 replies \ @Wumbo 13 May

I am not happy that the outage and backup failure occurred but:

I do like the way they did the UI to communicate the issue. "You have this much locked vs unlocked Sats."

Time will tell if it becomes a "rug pull" but so far they seem to be fairly transparent in resolving the issue.

I struggle to think of what I would do differently, if was the person running the service

reply

I'm not sure what you can do. How realistic is it to freeze funds until you can figure out who owes what? It seems like an impossible task... and even if you do figure it out, there will be questions about whether it's accurate.

I'm not sure what'd I do in this situation. Seems like a bad situation all around.

reply

I know users are frustrated but they seem to be patient.

CoinOS is managed by one person

reply

@ek is there a way to pay the territory fee as an invoice so I can pay with primal?

@grayruby @Undisciplined @Aardvark

reply
13 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 13 May

Disable all sending wallets and a QR code should show up

reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 13 May

If you're already KYC'd into Primal, you can just replace you CoinOS NWC send with one from Primal, and your lightning address with Primal's.

reply
13 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 13 May

Oh, good point

reply

You still haven't gotten your Coinos sats back? Are you all just fucked?

reply
You still haven't gotten your Coinos sats back? Are you all just fucked?

You guys still do not run your own fucking nodes? SUCH LOSERS

reply

I do and I think RBD only had sats on there temporarily to pay upcoming territory rent.

reply

he is crying like a baby showing that his few sats on coinos are the only ones that could use.

I can pay with primal?

Just look at this... still using another custodial shit. People will never learn the lesson. Too much drama and noise for nothing. RUN YOUR DAMN LN NODE !

reply

I'm surprised you aren't being a Cowboy Credits maxi about this.

Clearly he should have built up a huge stash of Cowboy Credits for rent payments.

reply

#979012 There's a difference between being "CC maxi" and "run your node maxi". Are 2 different things when is about using SN.

Seems that people still do not understand my position about this.

  • If you REALLY want to use SN with your own sats: connect your own LN node.
  • If you agree that SN is "pay to post" then is much better to use CCs.

But some people want both. That is not easy.

reply

https://postimg.cc/Xp3KCxbW

I always said: for what is worth it... CCs are perfectly fine for a "pay to post" place like SN and much safer and cheaper than any custodial account attached to SN.

But yeah... people are calling Darth crazy... but you cannot ignore the consequences of my advice.

reply

I feel like the meme would be better if Pam had a Vader mask on.

reply

maybe is @plebpoet 😂😂😂😂😂 ?

reply

I can see that

reply

Lol as long as your sats lost is cheaper than buying a Pi4 or running a cloud node you stiill coming out ahead

reply

even if they don't rug users, I'm pretty sure this is the end of their business. Nobody is gonna recommend it.

reply

What a shame, they could have used Lightning.Pub as a back-end and streamed the transaction logs to a second instance for instant recovery

reply

For now everything seems transparent, I agree with the comment of the friend @Wumbo

We hope to see how it is solved, on the other hand always keep in mind that this was a service where custody did not have, so I only use it as a vault to keep.

preventing any failure that leads me to a significant loss of funds.

reply
221 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 13 May

If it's resolved it's not a rug pool. You were using a bank you weren't paying for. What did you expect? If anyone is attemtping a rug pull here, it's you. You just failed.

reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @Car 13 May

The rugs will continue until people realize Bitcoiners are also after your Bitcoin this cycle.

reply

Sorry @denlillaapan but I think I accidentally helped @ek in generating controversial posts to boost SN item count 😅

reply

Shame.

But it's ok, he's lost anyway

reply

He has no chance?

reply

Not unless he pulls stunts like he did the other week

reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @beejay 15 May

My locked 19k sats (a few hundred unlocked, as they were from after May 10) were fully available this evening. I spent them on some #v4v stuff right after recovery. All good now. And the main guy at Coinos kept everyone abreast of the updates via Telegram, email, and replies to DMs the whole time since 5/9

reply

Yup I’m good!

reply

Why don't you guys just use zeus wallet. Or phoenix. Or one of a number of non-custodial options? They work great and integrate well.

reply

I used to use phoenix until they left USA

I need an “attached” wallet that can connect to SN

reply

Phoenix is back in US

reply

Blink works

reply

Phoenix works as an attached wallet? I was unaware of this. Its lightning address is experimental and when I tested it never worked.. but I'm curious about what you are talking about here.

Zeus uses hodl invoices for lighting addresses which people don't like (me included).

reply

In my experience lightning addresses in general do not work well as an attached SN wallet

reply

I mean... they do though? Lightning addresses have always worked for me...

reply

Perhaps I should have emphasized it is my experience. I do recall @k00b saying there was an issue with using some LN addresses as an attached wallet too, but that was a while ago. Maybe things have improved.

reply
106 sats \ 9 replies \ @k00b 13 May

Unless you're using ecash with Zeus, Zeus lightning addresses still require you to open the app to accept a zap.

reply

Exactly. This is not a great UX IMO. Its fine, but not what I wanna do. I'd rather run my own server or use eCash.

reply

Short of running a server... either it's custodial or an LSP (although Zeus 'is' a full node where you can open your own channels).

What will 'the masses' use in the future?

FWIW, I've been using eCash for a while. Switching back to my own node. I like to try stuff for a while regardless of what Darth says ;)

The funny thing is the reason I really went to eCash was because I could not get NWC to work on my node. Today it just worked... I have no idea what I was doing wrong or if it was an issue with Alby Hub or SN. I think it was with my node because I couldn't get Nostr apps to work with NWC either.

They do work but he was using Zeus which has hodl invoices which aren't super reliable in my experience.

reply

May I ask... do you find that the payments just don't go through?

reply

That's interesting. Its all I've used for receiving. Do you use NWC for receiving?

reply

Yes. I had trouble with Zeus early on, and I think another one too. NWC has been best for me. I used LNC with lightning terminal for a while too, but that wasn't as reliable.

reply

Zeus uses hodl invoices to avoid having to have a server online all the time. They are flakey in my experience as well. Coinos and Minibits work pretty well but they are custodial and have had issues from time to time with SN's throughput.

reply

Do you think they aren't paying out? Or you just can't redeem them (the invoices?) I was getting Brains payouts to a LNaddress, plus stacker news and aside from having to 'claim' once every 24 hours it worked OK. I wish i had 48 hours and the zeus app was quicker to load (although keeping it 'on' in the background may help too)

reply

Failed payments was the issue I saw but I quit using it. I don't think Zeus is the best option for lighting addresses. Better if there is an always on server to handle payments.

LOL, in the early days I tested NWC and specifically Alby Hub on my node. It was failing. Now it works. Not sure what changed but it does work for both paying and receiving now.

reply

I think I may have found a SN bug with LN address support.

reply
reply

Good think I only had 1000 sats on mine

reply

I'm still wandering why you're having coinos issues. Mine is working perfectly perfectly fine

reply

In fact, they update frequently, and they already enable withdrawals for most, good day

reply

just wait until this happens with a big cash mint

reply

This is where self-custodial wallets win :)

reply

I think you can buy cowboy credits as an invoice and use them to pay for the territory

reply

i know they had plan to make their front-end self-hostable. I hope that still happens, sounded like it'd be something similar to albyhub that you could run on your own hardware.

reply

I support you. Self-custodial wallets win this one.

reply