pull down to refresh
Doing egress stuff today I encountered two pretty nasty bugs in the latest 22.x nodejs release, so perhaps I am seeing this stuff but don't have all your context and take it for granted.
I've had the same pair of Lindberg frames for ~7 years. They were expensive ($800 IIRC), but they've paid themselves off by not needing new ones every few years.
They are a single gauge of titanium wire (don't warp/bend/break) without screws (nothing to come loose). They are so light I can't tell I'm wearing them.
I popped off a nose pad once and lost it so I had to order new ones on eBay, but otherwise I expect them to last for life.
Your attention to detail is much higher than mine (and most) but I am seeing release notes blow up and vulns getting fixed in releases also introducing 10s of new things.
I was thinking a solar flare but not much is happening: https://www.spaceweatherlive.com/en/solar-activity/solar-flares.html
Looks like it's over whatever it is: https://www.fly.faa.gov/adv/adv_list?whichAdvisories=ATCSCC&advisoryCategory=All&date=2026-11-13&airflow=true&_airflow=on&ctop=true&_ctop=on&gStop=true&_gStop=on&gDelay=true&_gDelay=on&route=true&_route=on&other=true&_other=on
That list shows a national ground stop, but when you click it says "no advisory": https://www.fly.faa.gov/adv/adv_otherdis?adv_date=11132026&advn=111
Edit: refreshing my browser shows it. buggy faa website
fwiw Someone in the lab that does local AI stuff recommends fewer more powerful GPUs because communication ends up being a bottleneck.
It looks like the 7k sat payer's wallet is failing. There's not much you or I can do about that.
I'll spend some time looking more closely today (the "invoice for 0 sats cancelled by payer" is unexpected).
If your wallet is healthy and there's nothing in your logs showing failures, then I'd guess the zapper only had CCs.
- zappers may have chosen to send you CCs instead of sats
- there could be an issue paying your receiving wallet
- if the zap is small and you don't have a direct channel to SN, the routing fee may exceed SN's 3% max fee
- check your wallet logs for clues
If you don't know what to post, then don't. Comment instead. Do not use AI to write or think for you, e.g. "write me a polite post about being new from <country> after you've connected my wallet."
What's weird to me is that initially it was just "oh, he's got a spy mistress, dang sucks for him." Then when the other affair leaked the shareholders/board suddenly started to care? Maybe it's just correlation and the spy thing is way bigger than it seems.
The company will be worse off without him.
I had no idea they were teasing the volcano bonds for so long and they didn't happen. I thought they did happen and I was too poor and out of the loop to hear about it.
I hope Tether's skyscraper is shaped like a giant T with movie villain vibes.
Most of the reasoning seems kind of weak. It's hard to make sense of.
"sharing account credentials with personal, third-party, AI assistants can expose sensitive information, and actions taken by these tools may result in unintended purchases, account changes, or use of MileagePlus miles."
The carrier also said that using an AI agent to, for example, check in for a flight could violate federal regulations, including rules requiring travelers to verify in person that their luggage does not contain banned substances.
Even the analysts reasoning seems wonky. If their business is already dominated by intermediaries because it's what the market wants, why remove a new one?
"United is saying they don't want to add yet another, and potentially even more powerful, intermediary than they already face in terms of Google search, price-comparison metasearch sites and online travel agencies," he told CBS News. "Flight searches cost airlines money, and undoubtedly United wants to avoid the expense associated with the surge of AI bot flight searches."
Panels for the zine @Car picked up at the last Austin Zine Fest.