pull down to refresh
On (1), the tricky bit, among the many tricky bits, is I don't want other people crossposting the post about my dead cat to ~lol. So we'd need some kind of approval flow. In truth, I think only the OP should be allowed to add new territories to their content.
Mobile UI needs work too: https://github.com/stackernews/stacker.news/pull/2750
As for (2), I want to make it less exclusive to recent zaps and more about recent proof-of-sacrifice. Boosts and comment zaps should resurface old posts too.
Another thing I want is for great comments to surface among mediocre posts. I'm not sure how to structure it just yet, but if there's a great comment buried in a thread, I want it to appear alongside posts in hot and have it look the same as post with the title Undisciplined's comment on 'Crossposting is great but I want more' and clicking it will take you to the comment in the thread.
Oh I've described this before but I don't like time organization much.
I try do things I don't want to do early in the day/week, then the rest of the time I do what I want to do.
At the end of the week, if I procrastinated things I don't want to do, then I begin the next week with those, and so on.
Lately, I've been spending a bit more time thinking about what I want to do by writing about them. Then when I do them I don't need to make decisions and can just execute - which tends to make the results faster/better (I suck at task switching).
That's the general shape at least. This approach is helped by the fact that I never really stop working. I just do things until I spend all of the day's agency, then I binge watch Star Trek or read.
Looks like something STX adjacent to me. They're the only one that does these design agency quality landing pages with bitcoin's talking points.
Terrible shit happening to you is like your home getting a basement. The bottom floor is lower now but you still have access to the higher floors.
After clipping SN said...
Sorry about that. We need to fix these limits. We talk about it regularly. It requires making a bunch of defensive decisions. This will be a priority after the wysiwyg ships.
I went around looking at some things people made with base ui and much is awesome... until I do it on my phone, then half of it breaks.
Base ui is a thin/unstyled wrapper around html things, so it itself does not know mobile from desktop. I'd guess it's the inheriting project's lazy styling (and to your point, subsequent QA) that's making it break.
When automating coding, well thought out architecture of both the product and development processes becomes really important. I'd say this would be including comprehensive CI and human QA.
100%. I've seen a weird systemic apathy result from automated coding. If writing the code is easy, why would I bother continuing to do other hard stuff?
I pay attention to what the developers I know are using + have GPT Pro do surveys of options. Kind of like googling "best <thing> in 2026" once was. Then I follow the references, read the docs, browse the code, and do follow on searches from there, arriving at developer blogs and reddit posts. I concluded, tentatively, on stylex/base after several days of repeating this process a few times.
How the slider works is a headless component thing (radix in shad). Shad just couples styling presets with the slider which is most of what I don’t like about shad.
Also shad is already beginning to add base ui components too - they live alongside radix. They abstract away components really well, so as shad user you shouldn’t notice the transition.
maybe i've been unclear, but i'm trying to validate my decision to switch to base/stylex - not deciding if i should switch. i'm trying to think through what systems properties i want, attempting to avoid use this thing generally everyone uses by default without understanding the tradeoffs (and let's be honest, vibing and dgaf for the most part)
i know i don't want to use shad already. it's perfect for people that want presets and want these decisions to be made for them, and i get you can customize it too. that's what boostrap was for a long time, so i don't have anything against that.
having some experience being an end user of enshittified 3rd party libs now, I'm trying to pick things i'd be happy to troubleshoot/review/maintain myself. i want to provide the abstraction layers - which i will probably vibe too tbh, but at least i'll understand them.
by chemistry analogy, i'm looking to make my own molecules so i'm looking for the right atoms/elements. i'm not looking for a premade molecule.
maybe i should be looking for a premade molecule though. i just don't see much reason to start there when i can vibe my own molecules.
I upgraded my iPhone for the first time in seven years (my last one stopped getting updates). I’m impressed by how little difference the new phone makes on average while being much more pleasant to use. The only sense I can make of it is that the additional utility is negligible but tons of tiny things that I couldn’t identify are better.