pull down to refresh
i figured out a work around.
i know people hate spark, but i tried it out and it's pretty smooth , given al the leagal and infrastructure limitations
is it possible to exchange CC's for sats and pull them out through this or any wallet ?
i've mostly been away during the standardization of CC's on SN and it seems dishonest for people to be paying sats on my posts, but to only be receiving CC's
this is the stack that is going to bring the 8 billion normies to bitcoin
this is the stack that millions and a decade of development has been spent on because bitcoin was not meant tonbuy coffee
*rolls eyes
Chavez and Maduro sanctioned and isolated venezuela from the world market for decades ??
i guess Maduro kidnapped himself too, huh
I’ve been wondering for a while why you care about this. I do not intend to imply you or anyone else shouldn’t care, I’m just curious: do you have Ukrainian heritage?
I don’t. Still, I care that certain individual Ukrainian people don’t die, people like Orlovski.
But I don’t have any personal stake in what feels like a gang war, from a more libertarian, non starist perspective, or beyond a general sentiment that wars are bad for all regular non profiteering people, enough to send money or spend time killing other human beings.
These people have hated eachother for centuries before you or i was born, and will continue to hate eachother centuries after us...
Why do you care about this and not other conflicts equaly sovereignty encroaching?
I ask because u seem fanatically certain other people should care about this war as much as you do, to the exclusion of other wars and territorial encroachments going on elsewhere in the world at the same moment.
- copy everyone's coins
copy paste......?????
how did BCH do it or anyone else do it?
it's a public blockhain..... anyone can ??????
the question is so basic to how this network works i don't even know what to say , i'm dumb struck
- compensate developers and investors by diluting the extranonce 2009 sequence
diluting would imply * adding *or * increasing * bitcoin supply. This phrasing is loaded.
ecash will be Giving...GIVING... read that word out loud...ecash coins TO Satoshi ON the eCash network
- minimize code departure from existing Bitcoin ?
this betrays real ignorance about the project, but you asked in good faith i hope
CUSF Core Utouched Soft Fork is an enforcer that allows inheriting Core ...untouched.
Look at that ! it's in the name !
so any future "improvements" core makes, ecash will get, plus many more valuable features through sidechains, such as vaults or almost any other applicable or experimental technology in computer science, including filecoin/ipfs/Prediction market oracles/zk/PQ/+.
If the user market finds these useful, they get ack'd and seamlessly integrated
NOT IF SOME CONCLAVE OF MOMS-BASEMENT DWELLERS CHOOSE IT ON CORE
btw you can also ask these of the Atreides LLM on ecash.com, its pretty good on primers about the technology.
and paul has recently put together a technical brief about the fork itself
https://github.com/ecash-com/fast-facts
and on satoshis coins
in general, I recommend that you not be so eager to alienate people, especially in the current sociopolitical climate
????????????
lol WHAT could this mean.....lollolollol
fine... i will reply with more precise pointers
"just explain ten years of the project and everything that is already explained on ecash.com"
no, do your own homework
if you don't know the answer to these things that have been discussed in public and easily available, then at most you should be neutral
the instinctive reaction by modern bitcoiners to dismiss anything not bitcoin is an evolutionary dead end
being pissed off about technical differences without technical arguments for this is an irrational
its not stealing satoshi's coins, its giving satoshi and everyone else already on bitcoin, coins on a new network with better capabilities
you. your post. the replies to it, are all evidence of the cultural risk:
non technical arguments, ignorance, or outright lying
in the hands of a few influential people they become political risk. Drivechains mitigate these risks, they do not get rid of them nor is that the intent.
lightning doesn't scale and if bitcoin doesn't scale, it dies or gets replaced by something that does. period.
States and competing chains have not really even begun attacking bitcoin yet. Retardation like Bip110 is just a small example of the kind of signal corruption and time waste states and bad actors are capable of were they to really try.
Drivechains ends THAT kind of politics.
Through crack smoking like yours and particularly the poisons introduced by peter todd and luke dashjr into the development history, bitcoin is already 42% sick.
42% of the total market and activity is outside bitcoin and at best your solutions try to pay LESS total fees to the miners securing it.
bitcoin is not perfect and has and will change
How should this change happen? The current process is broken, political and slow. DC allows market/user choice. Individual opt-in to changes that leave the base layer untouched, and on which you can stay if you want.
Politics will reappear, the point of BIP300/ecash is not to end or escape politics but to channel it constructively and in ways that those who risk most profit most or learn why they are wrong.
Current Bitcoin devs can get jobs doing something else if bitcoin fails. peter todd and others have stated this repeatedly, that if changes to bitcoin they don't like are made they will do something else. Please Go. Shooooo!
The difference is between the current centralized papist/cardinal enclave like decision making of core, BIPs on github, and influence brokers, like catholic Europe, versus the free enterprise of protestant America.
Is it not obvious that millions of currently silenced devs will be more rational, more creative, more ecosystem saving, than a few privileged-to-have-been-early OG's blowing white smoke out of their ass to approve or disapprove certain things on bitcoin?
After fork day, sell me your ecash, and we will cut off your head off with it. (metaphorically)
for sure, and for the record i am not trolling, it just appears like my humor at their expense is trolling because my opposition are all clowns
"LN can be improved" for ten years
just another ten years and funding for your kids college right ?
ecash will end all these useless dev subsidy programs and generate real innovation
Drivechains are just a custodial federation where miners control the funds. This has negative impact on the miner's main job which is to advance the chain without any reorgs or empty blocks.
false, lightning based cashu is a custodial fedimint where mints have control over the IOU's they print for your sats, drivechains are not, this is either a technically inept interpretation unfamiliar with the mechanism at play or outright dishonesty. A six month poll vote on the state or shape of something is not control or a fedimint.
However, this combination of incentives is fatal. Bitcoin ALREADY suffers with having insufficient fees on the
it would be if that was what drivechain was, but its not so its not fatal. BMM drives MORE fees to L1 because each tx on a L2 is a fee paying L1 tx, whereas lighting can have an arbitrary number L2 tx's between old and heavy channel maintainers that do not reflect in their final settlement on L1. All while being trusted and custodial.
Drivechains maintains self-custody AND each tx is reflected is proportionally mirrored by a fee paying and thus security/network supporting tx on L1
it's not a new argument, Sam Harris and others have claimed they could flatten the Gazans for at least a decade or more and that their restraint is a sign of benevolence
this claim is just a modified version now that Gaza is flattened
for them it is a religious Bible(Torah) based law to completely destroy and annihilate the enemy, so from their perspective anything less is benevolence