pull down to refresh
I have a Delay Tolerant design bias so I personally want less rounds lol.
There's some nonsense I'm cooking up that may be best described as:
But I'm going to try to make it as not cursed as I can think of lol.
This is probably the hard, but right way. Although I would assume at the cost of more rounds. Can you send me some documentation you'd recommend I look into?
Ack means acknowledged. Since its winning, some more details about how it might work.
The main note is posted by the proposer of the event. The event proposer can specify a threshold of signers for the event to be valid. The note will not show in unspecified user's feed until it reaches the threshold of signatures from specified npubs.
Specified npubs will get a notification similar to if they had been tagged. They will then co-sign the event in a way that I would imagine to be similar to reacting to a note.
This kind would have a timeout so that clients and relays know they can safely discard a note that does not reach its threshold.
If a note does not specify npubs, then anyone can co-sign
tsk man you're just gonna list some high paying job and then throw some 30 year mortgage on it and call it a day.
The point is not that 60% of people could get a place to live if they just moved, the point is honestly that needing to pay off a home for 30 years is nuts to begin with (Now 50).
AND
That the job market is not big enough for a significant percent of people regardless of where they moved (because they'd each be competing for each other's jobs) would not be able to afford a home. Its a systemic problem.
And dammit, even if everyone could be getting a remote job, just why live in the US? You'd save so much money living somewhere else.
Man a tool that gave people a somewhat automated estimation of income to living expenses per region would be really freaking nice.
Maybe then you could give me an example of a job near an area with what you would consider an affordable home.
ps: Alaska is probably the only exception because you can just live in the wilderness and build a home and if you live there long enough uncontested you just own it lel
The point is that the problem of housing availability exists everywhere in the country where there are places to work.
If the choice of housing were independent of job availability, your point about housing being cheaper inland would make sense, but the cheaper housing inland only has the exact same income to home cost ratio. So its the same problem of affordability regardless of the actual price.
In typical American fashion, the government once again uses companies as a proxy for what people fear government of having. People fear government surveillance, but then give even the smallest of details to a company for them to sell to government agencies.
Once again we have people who fear a central bank digital currency, and yet whole populations adopting a foreign nations company scrip which follows the regulations and laws of a foreign government, fully capable of the same things people fear in CBDCs.
PS: I'm just talking about the USDT users
Would you like assistance with non-API based page scraping? Captchas are just an extra thing you have to do in code you know.
I do agree that we have a shitcoins 2.0 problem that we have to think about how to socially defend against and I think Ark is not the best solution to our problems, but the idea that covenants are useless and give us nothing is a bit outrageous.
https://github.com/JohnLaw2/ln-scaling-covenants
Dissect some of these neat proposals by JohnLaw2, and I'll reconsider.
Lets say to make this helpful for more people than my specific situation, that I'm free after work for a few hours before bed and then I'm not doing anything on weekends.
I just suggested what I thought would be easiest. You can import your wallet into the node software if you want.
and yes you can send them to a new wallet if you want, but it isn't any better or worse. The only thing you're doing by sending the coins somewhere new is defending against someone taking the valid signed transaction from one chain and broadcasting it on the other. I guess if you send to a new wallet there's less footguns to worry about?
To get into the weeds, you could also send the same UTXO to the same address, but just with different fee rates on each chain. As long as the newly created UTXO is different in some way, but I don't suggest that because of the higher chance of footguns if you do it that way.
I'll be posting a Request for Comment. At this rate maybe a couple of RFCs. It'll be a stacker news post (as well as in the NIP repo), but I'll ping you when its ready.