Code is speech:

I know he's old, but I would prefer Ron Paul heading up this thing by himself. Addition by subtraction.

Rockets

JFK: We are going to the moon not because it is easy, but because it is hard. Of course, many stackers don't believe in the moon landing 😀

Now do we all have to tell @DarthCoin that he was right again? I'm tired of this.

About a contest? I ran two in books and articles. There seemed to be little interest after the first two. I run a contest every week in beginners.

Sometimes users do a better job. If you want, run a writing contest in my territory. I'll even help you out with sats if I like your idea.

That's a great site!

I'm not certain, but I think coinbase is the main custodian for all the big corporate entities. I think the fact that it is a public company supposedly adds credibility.

Thanks for the plug.

Because it's a publically traded company, it has been given a valuation premium above the fiat value of the bitcoin it "owns." (If you trust coinbase). It is a toy for hedge funds to play with volatility. How long Saylor can keep all the balls in the air is anyone's guess.

Excellent!

It seems like I can hardly watch anything through invidious anymore. I can't wait for zapstream to take off.

I wonder how different the algorithm is if you sign in, or actually use a google account every day? I don't log in. Google might force log ins soon.

Almost every one has giant fiat numbers.

I think it really depends on the goals of a territory owner. I own 4 territories because I believe in SN and saw an opportunity to make a long term investment here. Each territory is different. One of them was a complete lark that I wanted to own even though it will probably take years to break even. Another one, which I put little time into yet, is performing the best despite my lack of attention. I don't care, because I'm retired and have the time to try different ideas at my own pace. I know others may not have that luxury.

On another point, people look at territories as a bad investment, but consider this: a few months back there was a lot of macro FUD about something or other, and it seemed pretty obvious that the fiat value of bitcoin would take a hit. I made a post asking if anyone intended to buy a territory when it dropped. I think the price wound up in the high 40s, a little less than half of what it is now. If someone bought a territory then, the financial pressure would be alleviated. You could stack sats for the rest of your life here if you believe SN is viable long term. I think it is.

If you didn't think so, you could sell your territory at or below market price with no financial risk.

Shocking result

Nice. Now I have to learn something else.