pull down to refresh
I don't use Twitter much these days. Whenever I do, the only account I visit consistently is Pledditor's (https://x.com/Pledditor). A fresh wind of common sense amidst the Bitcoin treasury simping...
@Pledditor, is that you?
Trump also said Obama to be a weak leader because he could not negotiate a resolution. Trump does the bidding of the industrial military complex, like any president before him. Spineless.
Will probably take a few months for it to be published~~
@remindme in 6 months
I saw the lightning labs logo under their partnerships, so must be taro then...
They also do usdt on eth and tron.
Yeah, the more I use it, the more I realize we're not there yet. It's pretty amazing, but there is no intelligence, just yet. Or maybe I haven't tried the latest models yet.
Sam needs money, lots of money.
Yeah, reading @cryotosensei on Singapore schools, or looking at the amazing care my son gets from his teachers here, who regularly need to attend training sessions on the latest developments in education science, I concur that our experiences differ from schools in some other places of the world...
However, this is before the Korean/Singaporean-style cramming and cut-throat competition kicks in primary or middle school... so my impression might change in coming years.
School systems aren't really universal...
Yeah, that's an important factor, especially if the environment is the culprit.
Being great proponents of home schooling around here you'll never guess what the result was: schooling exacerbates differences. (I can't figure out if girls improve objectively/absolutely; abstract of paper doesn't say): alternative summary = if you want your girl(s) to fall behind in math, TAKE THEM TO PUBLIC SCHOOL!
It'll be interesting to confirm that assumption by comparing the graphs for kids that have been homeschooled for one year. Is it the school environment, or is the fact of learning math for one year (be it at home, or be it in a traditional school) that causes such divergence? Probably harder to find "equivalent" groups of kids where the only difference is the one of being homeschooled, but who knows.
Also lovely to see that initial graph, almost a validation of Greater Male Variability hypothesis right there.
EDIT: Never heard of this hypothesis, the Wikipedia article seems to be fairly objective on a topic that could be targeted by social justice warriors.
To be fair, most of recent mainstream Bitcoin has become quite shenanigany~~
thousands and thousands of words at a time
The amount of words he produces is impressive.
I was just telling myself, when reading #1009243, does @denlillaapan use AI, too? No, can't be!
I should be more generous and give people the benefit of the doubt... some intellectuals did use the em dash in the before AI times...
That's live and running? I haven't really followed rgb and lightning labs lateat announcements... It's tether partnering with taro?
It was actually a symbolic moment for me when sat parity was achieved. I actually still use this as a rule of thumb when doing the conversion between krw and sats.
But seeing it here makes me realise i should re-evaluate my mental conversion rate.
It's very hard to be logically consistent when emotions come into play.
Matt Levine for me is very logically consistent. Mostly because either he truly does not care or is able to fully detach his writing from his ideological convictions.
That's probably why @denlillaapan dissecting Matt's articles leads to interesting reads. Supercharged emotional and ideological conviction injected into cold, yet humorous, rational articles.
I guess when you're asked to write an opinion piece for the NYT, ideology matters.
I agree specifics in the testing protocol will affect results...
I'm sure we'll see hundreds of similar studies come out, it's low hanging fruit and makes for good PR clickbait to please the fundings agencies. I'll try to refrain from sharing every iteration on this same topic~~
I've just corrupted my algorithm recommendations for the months to come just by clicking on this one link.
@soggycakes, is that you, Arthur?
Wow, this one was actually very informative!
What these banks will certainly not do is partner with a third party in technological development or distribution of stablecoins. They will do all of this inhouse. In fact, the regulators might explicitly forbid it. It follows then that this distribution channel is closed to entrepreneurs building their own stablecoin technology. I don’t care how many Proofs of Concept a particular issuer claims to be conducting for a legacy bank. They will never lead to bank-wide adoption. Therefore, if you are an investor, run for the hills if a stablecoin issuer promoter claims that they will partner with a legacy bank to push their product out to market.