pull down to refresh
Ah, I see. Thanks for clarifying that.
So, just to be clear, we're not expecting ineptitude in template selection, but attribute deviation from the theoretical optimum as censorship, right?
Could we be missing some legitimate deviations or is the expectation that, if legitimate ones did exist, those wouldn't make a dent either way?
The Censors leaderboard ranks which pool has the worst block health %.
lemme rephrase:
"when will lemmings survive by reducing herd cohesion to avoid jumping off cliffs together, at the cost of reducing their herd immunity against predation and starvation"
@m0wer please review my old ramble [it doesn't answer your question directly, because it was already ignored by the groupthink half a decade ago]
A couple of things:
- Leading off with "moderated by money" is already starting off on the wrong foot. Most people have a complex aesthetic and moral relationship to the word "money".
- You should have pitched it as an alternative to using ads and selling data for revenue
- Now (thanks to SN), you can legitimately claim that "empirical evidence supports the idea that small monetary payments can increase the quality of content"
- Asking randos on forums will get you a good sampling of the general "vibes" to the idea, but I don't think it will get you good signal on the real reasons they will or won't use a product. People often aren't very good at understanding the real reason they do things. They know they don't like this, and they'll reach for any reason to object to it, even if it's really the reason or not.
- Negative reactions doesn't mean people won't use it. Everyone rags on Twitter, TikTok, DraftKings, etc, but millions of people still use it. Take their words with a grain of salt.
they end up being a static label attached to the maker. Be it size based or coin age based.
please review my original ramble, again...
I'm completely opposed to fidelity bonds. I rarely pull out such scathing criticism, although I consider them worse than spinning rims on the training wheels of a bicycle at the Tour de France.
coin-age labelling is only used for prioritizing which strands of the UTXO history are selected for the next weaving of the resultant graph. there is no attempt for takers to counterspy makers, because that is the naive futility which opens the door to all this epicyclic overcomplicating of what could have been an incredibly simple protocol.
So it goes!
putt.day #105 ⛳ 5/10 Albatross
🟡🟡🟡🟡🟢
https://putt.day/s/GmTaT01Dt9b9
my best shots!!
putt.day #104 ⛳ 2/11 Albatross · 🔥4
🟡🟢
https://putt.day/s/Eq3iI4XJ-LmI
Big shower, 4 shower heads blasting me at once. Also, a central bedroom with no windows, so light can't disturb people who are sleeping.
🟥 A 41-Year-Old Worker Can't Believe How Many Coworkers Have the Means to Invest but Don't. Now He's the Old Guy Telling the Kids to Start Saving
putt.day #103 ⛳ 3/10 Albatross · 🔥55
🟡🟡🟢
https://putt.day/s/0mrjGGusKTUV
Also, I offered this retard 100k sats for free and he turned it down: https://x.com/Kruwed/status/2087522435847397525
He can't accept free coins from me since he knows I can deanonymize a of his onchain transactions unless he uses Wasabi 😏
I talk a lot of shit to my fight opponent in this thread: https://x.com/Kruwed/status/2087219092365210051
putt.day #106 ⛳ 3/14 Albatross · 🔥2 ·
🟡🟡🟢
https://putt.day/s/Fbr-DTY21soI
😂
Legitimate deviations might appear if the pool is accepting out of band payment for transactions.