pull down to refresh
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @xz 8 Jul \ parent \ on: You NEED to be Prepared For July 9th Stacker_Stocks
Also, markets have a tendency to price in events before they happen to a certain extent. Not trying to nullify the main point, just notice it was quite red across the board after the weekend yesterday.
I'm expecting quite a bit more.
this operation bears all the hallmarks of a technical demonstration... or a major cryptographic exploit.
or..
this operation bears all the hallmarks of a technical demonstration...
leading one to assume a major cryptographic exploit.
I remember Moody's downgraded gov bonds before, and the country decided to start it's own bond rating agency. Maybe France can do that too, it's problems are solved!
Online gambling syndicates, asset seizures, gold bars.. poor and inconsistent implementation of AML..
and the conviction of 10 Chinese nationals. Well, well, well!
Profligacy. Confiscation risks. Zero percent growth..
This is Europe’s moment.
I always love to read “economic strength is the backbone of any international currency." in Largade's monotonous, Germanic broadcast voice.
I think the delay between psychology of market participants and the historical price movement keeps growing. I dont mean the marketcap, just longer delays for the psychological changes to affect charts. Probably also the past few years of growing fomo in precious metals, central banks and retail.
I don't know whether ETFs that have mNAV valuations are schemes devised by bad people but I'd sure like to read into the South Sea Bubble sometime. I guess that probably financed debt which was not all written off by bankruptcy? Marrying global finance schemes with Bitcoin seems to have weakened price volatility.
My guess is psychologically, whenever there will be negative news on paper markets, sell-offs will gyrate the long-term psychology, but short-term and long-term are on seperate trajectories.
Is the music stopping on 21m? I feel we're approaching the stages in issuance and hash-rate when this is just how it plays out.
If not installing the Meta apps, it is the same if you log in through a mobile browser, it tracks your browsing, right? So, either way, they track your browsing history.
Is the only way to sandbox these mobile platforms to never log-in?
I was thinking about why MS Windows now offers a virtualization environment but macOS still doesn't have that natively. I think Apple must have cornered a large percentage of potential Linux users, whereas MS Windows is not gaining many at all.
I think there will be huge upside growth in Linux users, but this is a trajectory that'll take time. I think we must be changing in terms of basic computer literacy. Just my feeling.
Institutions first then retail? I'm not sure I even understand the difference in the different tickers, but that's what I understand. MSTR was just a regular equity (later backed with a Bitcoin treasury.) The derivative? tickers were first offered at huge denomination buy ins that is not for retail.
Yeah, I might be a bit cavalier with my assumptions but, was really odd read.
Well, I was under the impression not just just pension funds, but any company wanting to buy Bitcoin because.. it's supadupa risky asset. Right?
I hope I didn't skim over too fast, but it didn't seem to surprise me that there was not even acknowledgment of the reality that I thought was that, corporate/accredited investors not only would have difficulty getting exposure, you simply cannot gain exposure to Bitcoin through non-FCA regulated markets. Pension funds, for example, are not simply able to open a Coinbase account. Isn't this where MSTR came in?
One more sustainable source of bitcoin-holding companies’ premium valuation is that they are a particularly easy way to gain bitcoin exposure. In the UK, for example, getting bitcoin exposure can be fiddly. Buying bitcoin itself leaves you with the problem of storing it.
Or this article by FT's Robert Armstrong is only talking about retail. I don't have a full-time job writing for the FT, so I'll assume I'm wrong about something and assume the FT is impartial and exceedingly astute.
WSJ needs to clarify on whether it's aware of the different use cases when using words like Crypto and Bitcoin.
Military: The UK is strong Bullish some defence stocks, regardless of the UK instinctively understanding that military conflict is not good for itself.
Europe says or does in climate regs should have no bearing on the world because nobody requested sci-fi theatre for their own policy.
We attribute climatic variation to overall anthropogenic co2 emmissions (based mostly on measurements taken since the 1970s, yet we barely question the overall feasibility of persistantly altering the earth's thermal and hydraulic transport system through large-scale geoengineering projects?
Northern Vietnam flooded this year, Cambodia and Laos seem to be increasingly susceptible to flooding over the years. In 2008 an earthquake collapsed 7000 school buldings and a large part of China was physically affected, offices buildings swayed in Bangkok.
Attempting to control a river that traverses the Tibetan plateau with gates and locks three times the depth of the Grand Canyon is ambitious. How accurate are current earthquake and climatic modelling prediction systems? There are a lot of people living in this part of the world.
Part of this is consumer preferences—paying with a card or a phone is less awkward and clumsy than having a bunch of change slamming around your pocket. But what we gain in convenience, we lose in privacy and freedom
I hear this a lot. Let me ask you, if you had the equivilant to 100 - 1000 USD in most currencies in bills, in your left pocket, and any smart phone in your right pocket, which one weighs more and takes up more space in your pocket?
I don't get it. No coins where I am.