pull down to refresh
@Undisciplined
5,376,880 sats stacked
stacking since: #88718longest cowboy streak: 483npub1t49ke...rm3srw4jj5
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 6h \ parent \ on: Gen X and Retirement Benefits: Uncertainty Abounds econ
Pretty much. They pretend to put what you pay in into a trust fund and then pay you out with that, but it's just an accounting fiction.
I know it will be a good thing, even if he does it tomorrow, but it infuriates me that he's making someone spend an extra night in jail who he's planning on pardoning.
Let Ross spend the night with his family.
It's been lagging a bit.
Edit: Now, it's not loading for me. I also noticed that after I sold my last ND shares, I got paid but still had the shares.
That's k00b and it's only meant to be temporary. He's expecting SN rewards to ultimately be supported by the fees generated by authentic use of the site.
It seems like he's reducing the subsidy, so I expect he's weening us off.
I get it. With the current setup, they need territories to be costly. That doesn't mean there aren't other possible setups.
In general, SN also leans towards making things costly, because of a belief that it generates higher quality outcomes.
14 sats \ 7 replies \ @Undisciplined 9h \ parent \ on: AskSN: Should territories be free to start? AskSN
You can always pitch k00b on a different business model. I haven't given the overall business model much thought.
14 sats \ 9 replies \ @Undisciplined 9h \ parent \ on: AskSN: Should territories be free to start? AskSN
SN doesn't get revenue from posts. It only gets revenue from territory fees. That's the business model.
14 sats \ 11 replies \ @Undisciplined 9h \ parent \ on: AskSN: Should territories be free to start? AskSN
Because territory rent is how SN makes revenue and no cost territories would likely be very spammy, as others have noted.
It would probably have more to do with who the other coaches are: three Hall of Famers in the AFC West.