The best time to buy was 15 years ago. The next best time is today.

That's how I feel too. However, there might be people stumbling across this territory who are just getting started on their journey and need these ideas smacked down.

That's never been me, but largely because that point is correct (also, I don't go to many parties).

Nocoiners need to keep hearing this. Every sat purchased will seem like a sat earned before too long.

Yeah, organic growth that improves your current users' experience isn't flashy, but it is sustainable.

The odds still aren't all available. They must be waiting for injury news/player availability.

I share the instinct to do this, but you're right to consider dropping your support. We want to support bitcoin businesses through their early hiccups. We also don't want new bitcoiners having these kinds of experiences.

I'd say we should tolerate mistakes to the extent the business owns up to them and makes them right. Mistakes plus lack of accountability is a really bad combination.

You too!

It would be annoying for sure, but my skills are all intellectual, so I wouldn't have a complex set of input costs.

The deadline is tip-off tomorrow.

No, we're going to the beach.

I bet the Raptors could land Lavine without much trouble.

Charlotte also came to mind, but I don't think it makes any sense. I would just enjoy watching LaMelo and Lavine.

We go nowhere and do nothing, now.

However, our daughter's finally old enough that traveling is less of a pain, so we're going to go on our first real vacation this winter.

This is close to what I was expecting the Bucks to look like this season.

Where do you think Lavine might go? My guess is always LA for him, but I also think he might work in Orlando.

It'll be another embarrassment if they don't.

That's pretty normal after firing the OC. You have to imagine the replacement has been pretty frustrated with all the same stuff as everyone else and at least had some improvements in mind.

Agreed.

One of the things working against normal people is not really knowing how to do the data analysis that would demonstrate a link. Every so often, I see someone present interesting suggestive evidence that they take to be conclusive. Generally, they don't want to hear about all the extra work that has to be done to make a robust causal claim.

It would be like making you eat a cast to treat your broken arm.

The other big issue is that they've never tested the combinations of vaccines or timing of injections. That's a lot of medical treatments to give children without looking into adverse interactions.

Normal people can't comprehend the slowness with which the federal bureaucracy moves. My biggest concern is that they'll run out of time, even if they try to do something good.

That famous study, which I've heard was not the first (but this isn't my area), was debunked by demonstrating evidence of fraud (IIRC).

What bothers me is that people bring up this paper as evidence that vaccines have no connection to autism, when it is nothing of the sort.