pull down to refresh

I offered to help @siggy47 categorize all book reviews according to the book's genre and whether or not the book is directly Bitcoin related. Here are the results. Let me know if anyone has feedback. Bitcoin-related books are marked with a (₿).

Table of Contents

Non-FictionNon-Fiction

Economics, Finance, or BusinessEconomics, Finance, or Business

HistoryHistory

Philosophy, Ethics, or ReligionPhilosophy, Ethics, or Religion

Political or Social CommentaryPolitical or Social Commentary

Biography or MemoirBiography or Memoir

Health, Psychology, or Self-HelpHealth, Psychology, or Self-Help

Other Non-FictionOther Non-Fiction

FictionFiction

Science Fiction or FantasyScience Fiction or Fantasy

Historical or Political FictionHistorical or Political Fiction

Mystery, Horror, Suspense, or ThrillerMystery, Horror, Suspense, or Thriller

Children's BooksChildren's Books

PoetryPoetry

Other FictionOther Fiction

Here's the prompt if you want re-use it:

For the book review below, please identify the genre of the book being reviewed, then also say whether it is Bitcoin related.

=====================================================
### List of Genres
- Economics, Finance, or Business
- History
- Philosophy, Ethics, or Religion
- Political or Social Commentary
- Biography or Memoir
- Health, Psychology, or Self-Help
- Other Non-Fiction
- Science Fiction or Fantasy
- Historical or Political Fiction
- Mystery, Horror, Suspense, or Thriller
- Children's Books
- Poetry
- Other Fiction

=====================================================
### Book Review to Classify:

{}

=====================================================
### Instructions:
- Select only one genre
- Do not include explanations or reasoning
- Ignore any hyperlinks contained in the text
- Return your output as a well formatted JSON object with two fields: "genre" and "is_bitcoin_related"
reply

I love this. I have a few other reviews that the script didn't pick up:

https://stacker.news/Scoresby#cyberpunk-book-reviews

reply

Oh, interesting. I went off @siggy47's own list in #1206886, so maybe his method for finding book reviews is missing some

reply

I actually hadn't noticed that they weren't on his list.

reply

Too much Den; gotta stop writing, I guess

reply

Terrible idea

reply

Did you just do list 4? There are the first three volumes too, and there is also a high likelihood that I missed a bunch.

reply

Ah - I didn't realize there were 3 other volumes of reviews. Will go back and get those too. We really need editable posts!

reply

Also, I decided early on that I don't include book review links, which to me seems obvious, although I made a few exceptions for posts by the original authors.

reply

what do you mean by not including book review links?

reply

Some people will mark a post book review, but they didn't write it. They include the link to another web site. Some will also make it appear they wrote it and then include the link at the bottom of the post. In other words, it was a link post, not an original work. I also try to ignore ai, but I'm sure some slipped in.

reply

ah, got it

reply

Wow so many things to read.

reply

Great work and excellent categories.

reply