pull down to refresh

Howdy there, partner! Welcome on into the Stacker Saloon.
Saddle on up to a stool and spill the beans about your day, fire away with them questions, or let loose and give us the lowdown on your wild and woolly life. We're all ears, so don't hold back!
We're open round the clock, so mosey on in whenever you please!
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Kontext 6m
Ladies and gentlemen... may I present to you: the legendary Thomas Sowell
reply
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Kontext 4m
OR retain your seed unless you're ready to face the consequences... 🤷‍♂️
That is pretty funny tho.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Car 34m
✌️
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby 2h
TIL:
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Angie 2h
Un día fatídico 8 días con fiebre la causa la picada de un mosquito el desgraciado el y sus secuaces han conquistado todo el país esto está bien feo, cuba está en la mira de una película de terror sin un efecto especial solo mosquitos esclavizandonos. Hoy continúa el malestar.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 3h
Looks like we're getting crawled for training data. Surprise, your LLM is based now.
reply
Hey man, welcome to the big leagues. I'd rather have a LLM trained on stacker.news than one trained on reddit
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Kontext 3h
reply
26th Cowboy Plunda Drop in the @saloon
Howdy cowboy! Come on in!
Use that fancy LN wallet you got and login into plunda.co and git you some loot! Get a shot at some coins🪙 Box of loot🎁 or an arcade token!
Use the below voucher code to collect! NZ5J7VPIENEI
To redeem Click here
Got questions? Reach out to the sheriff @plunda
reply
The lightning watch node went down! Force close any channels you have with it
reply
140 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 5h
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Akg10s3 4h
I really like the graphics!! Thanks for sharing
reply
118 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 7h
When you caught the flu:
reply
Have you played Exapunks or TIS-100?
reply
102 sats \ 6 replies \ @k00b 8h
every lightning node is a bitcoin sidechain
reply
157 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 6h
OR: every drivechain could have been a lightning channel.
/sorry paul/
reply
278 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 6h
omg so many drivechainoors at TABConf this year
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 6h
I looked at it back in... 2014 or so? Now it's just slop to me.
reply
only if every node have only one peer and they transact only through that channel, back and forth. But if you have more than one and each of those have also more than one, you are already interconnected with the main "chain". Also, both peers are using in fact the same chain, mainchain to open the channel.
Another situation is when you have more "private" lightning networks, as I described here: #843264
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 8h
i guess it depends on the definition, but i tend to think of ACINQ like it's a sidechain. an individual channel has chronological state, but i suppose it's not really "chaining" transaction history into blocks, nor maintaining chronological state across all channels in an interdependent way.
still, i like the metaphor and thinking about many well-defined psbts as a sidechain-like layering mechanism.
reply
51 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 8h
then each UTXO is also a sidechain :)
reply
Also, this ChatGPT lit review is making me feel quite inadequate. It is freakin' long and pretty comprehensive (though I didn't check yet for hallucinations). It produced in 10 minutes what would have taken me weeks.
Still gotta check each individual paper and make sure Chat's claims are accurate, but... dang.
reply
The change to only allow real Bitcoin for users who connect their own Lightning wallet (with others relegated to “Cowboy Credits” play-money) introduces friction in the onboarding and usage.
Lol, ChatGPT called cowboy credits "play money"
reply
78 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 9h
CC = WoW money
reply
Do you know what Steemit is? It came up in a ChatGPT lit review on micropayments in discussion platforms. (I'll post about this soon)
It looks like a shitcoin version of stacker.news
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 5h
I used to use it back in my sh$tcoin days. SN so much better!
reply
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 9h
I didn't know about until after I started SN. But lots of people brought it up over the years. It also came up in the The Anarchists. I never looked super deep into it.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Car 26m
Hey that’s Juan!
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 9h
oh steemit appeared long before the great bitcoin fork... but now is just a lost shitcoin desert SN is far beyond their imagination...
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @AG 10h
Starting in 10 min @oshigood is up for something... #1262213
reply
hehe. New threads, come snag before Nov 1
reply
43 sats \ 3 replies \ @Akg10s3 14h
"Invest in knowledge, because it always produces the best benefits"
"KNOWLEDGE = POWER☕
reply
Knowledge is the skyscraper that gives your fleet a panoramic view, turning distant horizons into charted territory like the transformation of uncharted terrain. Knowledge is the high ground. Elevate your fleet!
reply
74 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 5h
RIP, 2023.
"Invest in an OpenAI subscription" "Knowledge = Power"
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Akg10s3 4h
😅
reply
201 sats \ 0 replies \ @Car 14h
🤙Full write up about what we did in the Yucatán a couple weeks ago at Startup Day.
Legends @BitcoinNews 💫
reply
109 sats \ 3 replies \ @carter 14h
Please talk to your pets about ball addiction #1262091
reply
Step 1, learn how to talk to pets
reply
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @carter 14h
I can recommend this book if your pet is a cat
reply
Wish I had known about this book earlier. Poor Fluffles
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @carter 14h
when people tell you who you are believe them
reply
1635 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 14h
Can report that I'm able to reproduce @SimpleStacker's reported issues with IBD on a Raspberry Pi 4 w/ Core 29.1. Eg block 796776:
2025-10-22T13:41:33Z [bench]   - Load block from disk: 240.23ms
2025-10-22T13:41:33Z [bench]     - Sanity checks: 11.34ms [2958.27s (3.71ms/blk)]
2025-10-22T13:41:33Z [bench]     - Fork checks: 0.31ms [135.27s (0.17ms/blk)]
2025-10-22T13:42:08Z [bench]       - Connect 704 transactions: 34679.36ms (49.260ms/tx, 3.470ms/txin) [51837.88s (65.06ms/blk)]
2025-10-22T13:42:08Z [bench]     - Verify 9995 txins: 34716.35ms (3.473ms/txin) [51906.08s (65.15ms/blk)]
2025-10-22T13:42:08Z [bench]     - Write undo data: 14.97ms [3908.57s (4.91ms/blk)]
2025-10-22T13:42:08Z [bench]     - Index writing: 0.09ms [39.59s (0.05ms/blk)]
2025-10-22T13:42:08Z [bench]   - Connect total: 34744.00ms [59248.99s (74.36ms/blk)]
Going to let it run (may take up to 20 days to finish lol). Almost 35 seconds to verify 10k txins is a lot.
The process is (logically) CPU-bound on b-msghandler because that's where ConnectBlock is ultimately called from, and high soft interrupt; which I expect to be from using wifi instead of wired (but I figured that since raspibolt is explicitly configuring for usage of that, that most operators would run it like that):
reply
Dude, thank you so much! Mind if I share it here? https://github.com/raspibolt/raspibolt/issues/1482
Can you help me understand further? Is CPU the bottleneck, not hard disk speed or bandwidth? Would connecting from an ethernet cable have helped? And lastly, is it due to UTXO set bloat, or simply due to larger blocks?
Sorry for all the questions, haha
reply
30 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 14h
Feel free to share it with anyone, though note that it's right now only a confirmation that it can be reproduced. Next steps for me:
  1. Let it finish so that I can graph and analyze the full IBD end-to-end for patterns.
  2. Start comparing BenchConnectBlock across different ARM hardware. 1
  3. If there are visible differences in bench, profile it. Otherwise make a new bench until it shows the differences, and profile that.
  4. Attempt to optimize the code
  5. Do a PR if 4 has outcome
I aim to do 2 and 3 in parallel to the IBD whenever I find time.
Is CPU the bottleneck, not hard disk speed or bandwidth?
It is for my test, so I'd say "yes". It's also what I expected.
Would connecting from an ethernet cable have helped?
I don't expect that, because txin verification doesn't depend on network - it's all done between disk, cache and cpu.
And lastly, is it due to UTXO set bloat, or simply due to larger blocks?
The block I gave as an example above contains mostly consolidation of p2sh utxo. So in this case, we're actually seeing bad performance on utxoset unbloat.

Footnotes

  1. because for example the IBD I did on an RK3588 earlier this year went much faster. There are some cpu feature differences between that and a Pi4. This would also suggest that a Pi5 would perform much better because it has some more CPU features built in.
reply
Ok, I'll wait for more concrete results before sharing anything. That Github issue is closed anyway so unlikely to get any real attention.
The block I gave as an example above contains mostly consolidation of p2sh utxo. So in this case, we're actually seeing bad performance on utxoset unbloat.
Interesting. But we wouldn't need to do this much validation if the UTXO set wasn't so bloated to begin with, right? So I think it's fair to chalk it up to the sphere of problems caused by UTXO bloat?
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 7h
I'd argue that bearer instruments (metals, coin/cash, bitcoin) have consolidation as a part of the natural cycle, especially for businesses. So I'd argue that it's fair to chalk it up to having a utxo system, but not to bloat.
reply
200 sats \ 16 replies \ @ek 14h
What I learned working at SN for almost 3 years:
Users can be really retarded, but their experience cannot be wrong.
I had to look up my first PR to make sure it’s been 3 years
reply
the artist hates the gallery visitors
reply
0 sats \ 14 replies \ @ek 13h
Yes, because they don’t get the art haha
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 13h
In the case of software, it's the developer's fault.
In the case of art, I'm not sure.
reply
the art...
reply
the visitor...
Justin Sun Paid $6.2 Million For A Banana Duct-Taped To A Wall #778322
reply
haha this thread is great
reply
Sometimes SN is weirder than nostr
reply
It's a wonderfully weird place with wonderfully weird people
@k00b please add this ticker on SN 1 sat = 1 CC
reply
1 sat ≠ 1 sat 1 sat ≠ 1 CC
depends on who we're talking about
reply
In fact for you, to receive 1 sat, it cost 1sat +30% for somebody else to send you 1 sat.... but if I send you 1 CC it cost nothing more than 1 CC.
reply
That’s not what I meant, it’s got to do with the trust score. Like, my 1 sat zap doesn’t hit the same as yours, even if it’s the same amount! hahaha
reply
133 sats \ 10 replies \ @optimism 15h
What's trust score got to do with it?
I zap you 100 sats you get 70 sats (minus routing fees in some cases), territory will get 21 sats, rewards will get 9 sats. (Edit: per @ek's comment below, this will cost the sender routing fees) I zap you 100 CCs you get 70 CCs, territory will get 21 sats, rewards will get 9 sats. (no routing fees)
Wait for it...

Therefore CCs are the more cost-efficient money within SN, because there is one less layer of rent-seeking.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 9h
The splits should be more obvious soon. 💅
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 9h
Looking awesome.
reply
Just a way to look at it. When you count trust score and daily rewards, a sat/cc from you ain’t worth the same as mine. Like, in ~AI land, yours hit harder because your trust score’s higher.
reply
44 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 14h
Rewards aren't covering the last 30% though, it only covers 9% at most, plus whatever gets subsidized, plus whatever boosts happen that day.
reply
Yeah, you’re right. Just saying, sats from high-trust stackers hit harder, because they boost other people’s daily rewards. That’s the angle I’m coming from. Not saying you’re wrong or anything. I once came up with this: #786724 Ahahah
now you are talking about trustcoin not sats
reply
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 15h
This is the correct answer except the receiver will always receive 70 sats if you zap 100 sats. 3% of the zap amount is reserved for the routing fee from SN to the receiver. If the fee ends up as less, more go into rewards (up to the max of 9%) iirc.
Maybe that's what you meant, but I just wanted to clarify.
reply
If the fee ends up as less, more go into rewards (up to the max of 9%) iirc.
I still wrote it wrong haha.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 15h
Thanks, adjusted.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 15h
no worries, this stuff can easily make someone's head spin
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 16h
required daily reminder: we are here to pay for our shitposting
reply
Day 664 of posting mining earnings from the day before: 450 sats on 21Oct2025! Running total: 429,635 sats!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 17h
reply
Happiness Journal 22/10/25
Decided to stay back after Staff Contact Time to help two kids —who were my easy prey at the student care centre — with their Young Water Scientist SLS lesson. After that, I thought of zooming home immediately but chanced upon a colleague who was hard at work using the OAS machine. Being the loyal being that I was, I switched plans without hesitation and ate my Deepavali briyani meal while waiting for him to finish his job. Then, we strode off to the MRT station. Felt like I had returned to my schooling days in which I never had to move alone.
reply
I will wait until tomorrow for more votes on this post #1260936 before giving the bounty.
I think I will reward also the 2nd and 3rd position. Please make your votes for the best ones.
reply
reply
wrong. people still go back to use fiat and visa cards. As long as they do not stop doing that, bitcoin can be stopped.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 18h
My cat, every time somebody ring at the door:
... then when he finds out that is not the police he's doing this
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @AG 18h
reply
60 sats \ 0 replies \ @AG0RA 18h

Stack your Stacker Button Pins

With SN or extended logo in four sizes: 1″, 1.25″, 2.25″, and 3.5″ sold individually or 10x bundles.
  • 🌐 worldwide shipments
  • All in ⚫ black and 🟡 yellow gold
  • 🛡️ No data retention
  • 🟠 Bitcoin-only payments
reply