pull down to refresh

Operation Saylor - Episode 23/120

Hi again and welcome to another episode of the Operation Saylor. This is update number 23, corresponding to May 2024.
If you are reading this for first time, you might want to check Episode 1, where my plan and details are explained. That will get you in context.

Stats

  • BTC stack: 1.31191974 BTC
  • € stack: 93.60 €
  • Current total value in €: 80,120.70 €
  • € into BTC: 30,000 €
  • Paid back to bank: 8,056.40 €
  • Outstanding debt + interests: 35,887.93 €
  • Installments to go: 98

Charts


Log

Hello again, and welcome to a new episode of the series.
Today I want to continue with my thoughts on measuring performance that I started in the previous episode. Last month I discussed about risk and return to make the point on how we need to make comparisons using both of them if we want such comparisons to be relevant and useful. I also introduced the idea of performance only being truly understandable along the time dimension. It's not only the end result, but the state of the operation during all of its lifespan that should be accounted for. Finally, I made the point on how a naive comparison against a simple DCA just doesn't make sense.
This month, I want to continue the conversation by presenting two metrics that are key for our performance measuring exercise, and that I monitor every month even if I don't always report them in our monthly updates.
The first metric is quite straightforward. I call it exit value.
Exit value would be the financial outcome resulting of me cancelling the loan on any given day by selling whatever was needed from the Bitcoin stack. It's a metric that can be computed at any point in time, since my loan can always be repaid early and in full. The rough formula would be:
Exit Value = (€ Value of Bitcoin Stack + € Value of Euros Stack) - (Outstanding Principal * 1.01)
That magic 1.01 is explained by the fact that my loan has an early amortization penalty of 1% of the early amortized value. If I make an additional amortization of 100€ beyond my usual installments, the bank will actually charge 101€.
The concept is simple, right? What would be left for me if I change plans and chicken out of Operation Saylor. If on any given day the value of the Bitcoin I hold is larger than the 101% of the outstanding principal, the exit value is positive, which means I would come ahead with some extra value. On the other hand, if my Bitcoin stack is underwater and can't cover the outstanding amount, the exit value is negative. This reflects that I simply can't kill the loan just with the stack, and that I could either surrender to that or put more money out of my pocket to cover the difference. In this case, the outcome would be net negative for me.
Okay, now that hopefully you get the idea, let's take a glimpse at how Exit Value has looked like so far through Operation Saylor:
The story tells itself pretty much: Operation Saylor stayed under water for a bit at the start as the bear market touched its bottom, and then we've been going up. It's been long now since the exit value has been negative.
In the previous episode, I used the easy-peasy and plot-twist scenarios to illustrate two scenarios that end with the same balance but take very different paths during the lifespan of the Operation. Now that we are on the same page on the concept of Exit Value, the conversation becomes more fluent: the easy-peasy scenario is easy-peasy precisely because it holds a positive exit value all the time. The plot-twist scenario, on the other hand, is a painful path to success because I wouldn't have enjoyed that nice exit value situation.
Summing things up: positive Exit Value over time, good. Negative Exit Value over time, bad.
Finally, let's look at the second metric. Any two courses of action or scenarios could have different shapes of Exit Value. Comparing them is an exercise that you can do in many ways. Personally, my simple and quick shot at this is to run the integral of the Exit Value over time, which leads to a simple, single value that summarizes things nicely. If you are not mathematically inclined, simply think of it as: the more time I've stayed with a positive Exit Value, and the higher it was, the better. The more time I've stayed with a negative one, and the lower it was, the worse. The integral pretty much sums both facts up into a single number.
I'm not going to plot this now for you since the integral only becomes interesting when compared against some other scenario. We will leave that for further episodes.
I'll leave it here for today. I hope you found the episode interesting and that these concepts help you better assess your own options. As always, thanks for reading and I'll see you next month.

Previous episodes

I think your exit value computation ought to take capital gains tax into account.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @mo 22 Sep
I could bet you'll end up with 1 full BTC at the end of this!
For you? How @pillar's Operation Saylor ends up?
reply
What a great strategy!
After reading this, I get a craving to adopt a similar strategy with the help of your articles.
reply
Are you paying debt back from cash flows or selling a bit of bitcoin?
reply
I'm shaving a few sats off the Bitcoin stack in exchange for euros every couple of months.
reply
So as price goes up you sell a little but because you are getting more euros per sat your sat balance isn't declining dramatically. Not bad. As long as some exogenous shock doesn't hit and we drop back down to 30k or something. In that case you should have a back up plan to be able to cover fiat debt repayment via cash flows. You don't want to be in a situation like last cycle where the China mining ban and Elon environmental FUD took price from 60k to 30k in a month and it took 6 months to get back to 60k.
reply
So as price goes up you sell a little but because you are getting more euros per sat your sat balance isn't declining dramatically.
In a very simplistic way of looking at things, if Bitcoin would appreciate at the exact rate as the interest of my loan, I would come out of this whole gamble with 0 profit/loss.
The reality is that volatility is much more wild, and there have been both good and bad times (in terms of having to sell below and above my entry price).
Things are looking good, but only time will tell. There's more than 8 years of future left to see.
In that case you should have a back up plan to be able to cover fiat debt repayment via cash flows.
Yes, if the price stays low enough for long enough, the BTC stack goes away and I'll have to face the remaining debt with my own cashflows. Knowing this, I went for a level of debt that is manageable for my financial situation.
reply
Amazing read it for the first time and fell in love with the way you've arranged and planned for Bitcoin as an investment. It's making me jealous. I also prepare some charts for my investments but I'm never serious like you.
Awesome stuff!