I've never been particularly joyful about price crashing (it indicates a broken, illiquid, immature market; and the direction suggests maybe, just maybe, we were are wrong about this beanie-babies-taking-over-the-world thing). I've repeatedly said Bitcoiners being happy when price puking ("duh, bro; cheap corn; more sats for less dollars!") are idiots. Case in point: "Honey Badger Should Care: Why Bitcoin’s Price Action Does Matter"
Ok, fair enough; when I published that piece the BTC/USD exchange rate was -75% from where it is now (one-quarter). So yeah, everyone been happy since, blah-blah-blah.
But the point remains: this has been the worst cycle in bitcoin's history, while the fundamentals (adoption, information, products, institutions) have been the best. What gives? What's the mismatch?
Does this (point to chart above, putting us back to Nov 10) look like a strongly emerging, global reserve asset, with institutions and government allocating and everyone and their grandma coming in?
No, I didn't think so.
Since I can't explain why this nonsense occurs or make sense of it (you can almost never explain market moves), and my fundamental approach to all economics and financial markets is that prices are truth,
- what are we missing?
- Was this middle section (Nov 10-March 10) just a big mistake?
- 58k calling etc, and we should go back to pre-Trump?
- maybe zero is calling, and Peter Schiff was right all along?
But honestly, sats to the best explanation for why this increasingly liquid and increasingly established asset does this weird stuff (doesn't "behave") and has us along for the ride. Why doesn't it go away with larger flows and Hass Mccook's "DCA Army?"
Best I've seen so far is Checkmate's "air pocket"; we just flew through the 70s and 80s so there's no market price discovery there... so we gotta do back and re-do it. ("but why?" my monkey brain says... what's the law of nature that rules that?)