pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @janetyellen 11 Dec \ parent \ on: Quantum Computing Paper - PROSPECTS FOR QUANTUM COMPUTING: EXTREMELY DOUBTFUL bitcoin
Best quote from the paper:
"Will anybody be capable of riding this
machine?
Thus, the answer to the question in title is: As soon as the physicists and the engineers
will learn to control this number of degrees of freedom, which means - NEVER."
💯
They waste years on retarded ideas based on fallacies. Soft forkers are equivalent to the libtard elite thinking they know what's best for Bitcoin. They argue they know what's best for Bitcoin, just like the small minority elite in every government, thinking that they know what's best for the common man.
These are all gay and retarded ideas:
OP_VAULT because we already have multi sig and metal geo located backups. Physical multisig is superior. No need for a wasteful soft fork.
OP_CAT because it does not scale onchain.
Onchain does not sCaLe by design, for the very simple concept that we want everyone to run a node for mass decentralization. Cat just enables more shitcoin non monetary use cases which washes out any monetary use cases like multi party LN channels.
Soft forkers can go fork themselves!
2% is soo 2020.
2.9% is soo 2024.
3.9% is sooo 2028.
N.9% is soo xxxx.
We could have reached N%, if it weren't for these pesky bitcoiners and that pup.
Jerome and I are thinking about ripping out Bitcoin script and OP codes all together and just hard coding a few transition types on our nodes