pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @jbschirtzinger 19 Nov \ on: Meet Max Webster! The primary investor in Stacker News Stacker_Stocks
The audio quality is weird on this. It sounds like he is coming "in and out". I wonder how it was compressed?
Wrote a whole book review on Nixon recently here: https://booklight.top/posts/2024-11-05-watergate
In the context of that specific post, Nixon was removed by deep state kinds of elements that featured future heavy hitters like Hillary Clinton. The reason he was removed was because, the research of the book presents, he had plans to cut the federal government down. That didn't sit well with the swamp, and everyone started trying to figure out ways to get rid of him.
As for the rest of his policies, I think the general feeling I have is that they were products of their time and any manner of "radical change" got you ham strung. The military industrial complex was all ready advancing its goals heavily by then.
Oh well. Everybody always told me when I was young I was too young. They'll probably tell me now that I'm too old. I was also too fat, too skinny, and too smart, and at least at one point I remember, too white. I eventually became too apathetic to what everyone else thought I should be and I basically started that way anyway. Still, people felt the need to tell me anyway...
The standard in this thread has been to post book reviews in a discussion in part so that the content is here to be monetized. A link is content somewhere else that is valued. The article here increases SEO for stacker news AND the site in question. A link and the article carries more weight than a link alone.
This is good review
Thanks!
But we don't need links anymore for we can pretend it's our original writing till the end where we paste a link to other website.
Huh?
Ii wonder how much more reliable and faster mesh networks would be if ISPs under the direction of state actors did not have to try to censor shit all the time. As far as I understand, the development and infrastructure do a pretty bang up job of resiliant infrastructure maintenance.
That's a great question. There isn't much financial incentive to make privacy efficient. There is more reward to sell user data.
IP6 sounds like a digital gulag. Did we run out of unique IP4 addresses yet?
That depends on who you ask and what their motives are. Nat extends the address space to reach farther than it could otherwise.
MAC's can be spoofed, and if your operation is really that sensitive you have throwaway hardware
Yeah, and rich people have throw-away cars in case they need privacy from traffic cameras.
That's retarded, a handful of privacy larps aren't going to get the internet at large to use slow and unreliable comms
A handful of privacy larps got the internet at large to adopt the internet at large.
Hopefully you don't have any further omens, @siggy47.
Hey, not only did I get a shout out, but I see Slow Horses got a mention! Oldman rocks that series.
I've made some changes to the Rogue Scholar site, and have done some updates regarding the next release of the Celestial Intelligence Agency: Interstices. Apparently, though, the security certificate is slow in coming. Remember when we were less secure on the web but happier with http? Peperridge Farms does. If you are of a brave constitution, you can see it before Let's Encrypt makes it "more secure". Hell, I'm half-tempted to leave it that way as a kind of protest.
Yikes. Why do you think you hit the tree and went over the cliff in hindsight? I experienced that 360 degree vision business. It was disorienting.